Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34056594›Full record

ArticleJournal of breast imaging

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Imaging Education.

James S Chalfant, Sarah M Pittman, Pranay D Kothari, Alice Chong, Lars J Grimm, Rita E Sohlich, Jessica W T Leung, John R Downey, Ethan O Cohen, Haydee Ojeda-Fournier and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of breast imaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

James S ChalfantDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Santa Monica, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6385-604X
Sarah M PittmanStanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, CA,USA.
Pranay D KothariStanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, CA,USA.
Alice ChongUniversity of California, San Diego, Department of Radiology, La Jolla, CA,USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9763-3829
Lars J GrimmDuke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Durham, NC,USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3865-3352
Rita E SohlichSutter Health, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Department of Radiology, Palo Alto, CA,USA.
Jessica W T LeungThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Houston, TX,USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2232-2134
John R DowneyKaiser Permanente, Department of Radiology, Walnut Creek, CA,USA.
Ethan O CohenThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Houston, TX,USA.
Haydee Ojeda-FournierUniversity of California, San Diego, Department of Radiology, La Jolla, CA,USA.
Anne C HoytDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Bonnie N JoeUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, CA,USA.
Stephen A FeigUniversity of California, Irvine Medical Center, Department of Radiological Sciences, Orange, CA,USA.
Long TrinhSanta Clara Valley Medical Center, Department of Radiology, San Jose, CA,USA.
Eric L RosenStanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, CA,USA.
Shadi Aminololama-ShakeriUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Radiology, Sacramento, CA,USA.
Debra M IkedaStanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, CA,USA.

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast imaging education.

methodsA 22-item survey addressing four themes during the early pandemic (time on service, structured education, clinical training, future plans) was emailed to Society of Breast Imaging members and members-in-training in July 2020. Responses were compared using McNemar's and Mann-Whitney

resultsOf 136 responses (136/2824, 4.8%), 96 U.S. responses from radiologists with trainees, residents, and fellows were included. Clinical exposure declined during the early pandemic, with almost no medical students on service (66/67, 99%) and fewer clinical days for residents (78/89, 88%) and fellows (48/68, 71%). Conferences shifted to remote live format (57/78, 73%), with some canceled (15/78, 19%). Compared to pre-pandemic, resident diagnostic (75/78, 96% vs 26/78, 33%) (

conclusionThe pandemic has had a largely negative impact on breast imaging education, with reduction in exposure to all aspects of breast imaging. However, this may not affect career decisions.

Indexed as

breast imagingCOVID-19educationmammography

Identifiers

PMID34056594
PMCPMC7989417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.