ReviewDigital biomarkers
The Digital Neurologic Examination.
Review in Digital biomarkers. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Biomarkers for Early Detection and Monitoring of Neurological Disorders: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Breast cancer: pathogenesis and treatments.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Feasibility and Acceptability of a Multidisciplinary Academic Telemedicine System for Memory Care in Response to COVID-19.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2022Article
- Aligning mission to digital health strategy in academic medical centers.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- Training of neurologists for the 21st century: cultural and professional skills.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2022Review
- A Digital Health Service for Elderly People with Balance Disorders and Risk of Falling: A Design Science Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Consequences of inequity in the neurosurgical workforce: Lessons from traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital health has been rapidly thrust into the forefront of care delivery. Poised to extend the clinician's reach, a new set of examination tools will redefine neurologic and neurosurgical care, serving as the basis for the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.