ReviewJB & JS open access
Entrustable Professional Activities in Orthopaedics.
Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The development status of entrustable professional activities-based curricula in orthopedic and neurosurgical spinal surgery: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Utility of extended reality in shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of training efficiency and glenoid guidewire accuracy.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Assessment of surgical skills on a novel expert-informed immersive virtual reality simulator for distal radius fracture fixation: a cross-sectional validation study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- An Update to the Certificate of Added Qualification in Sports Medicine (CAQSM) Certification Blueprint.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026Article
- Surgical Silence: When Choosing Not to Operate Is the Wisest Course of Action.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in postgraduate periodontics programs in Saudi Arabia: A modified Delphi study.Journal of dental education · 2025Article
- Is it the right time to promote competency-based European Training Requirements in Ophthalmology? A European Board of Ophthalmology survey.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Article
- Consensus development and validation of entrustable professional activities for nephrology fellowship training in Saudi.International journal of medical education · 2025Article
- Developing and validating entrustable professional activities for neurology residency training programs in Saudi Arabia: a modified Delphi study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Developing a Framework of Entrustable Professional Activities for Residency Training in Hematology.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Development, implementation, and evaluation of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for medical radiation technologists in Taiwan: a nationwide experience.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Developing and Validating Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Rheumatology Fellowship Training Programs in Saudi Arabia: A Delphi Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2024Article
- Review
- Video-Based Assessment of Surgical Skill in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Technique Guide to Capturing Critical Surgical Detail.JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn entrustable professional activity (EPA) is defined as a core task of a specialty that is entrusted to a trainee once sufficient competence has been reached. A group of EPAs reflects the activities that clinicians commonly do on a day-to-day basis. Lists of EPAs have been created for most medical subspecialties, but not orthopaedic surgery. The aim of this study was to create a peer-reviewed list of essential EPAs that a resident must perform independently before completing orthopaedic residency training.
methodsA focus group of 7 orthopaedic surgeons from the University of Toronto developed a comprehensive list of 285 EPAs. For each subspecialty group, the opinions of at least 15 academic and nonacademic surgeons, as well as subspecialty-trained and non-subspecialty-trained surgeons, were used. The modified Delphi method was used to rank EPAs on a five-point scale from not important to mandatory for a resident to competent before exiting training. Two Delphi rounds were used, using a threshold of >50% of surgeons considering the EPA as mandatory before being considered for the next round. A final list of EPAs was ratified using the focus group of academic surgeons involved in the study.
resultsSeventy-five (75) of 107 (70%) surgeons invited responded to the survey. Nearly half (129) of the 285 EPAs were discarded after the first round of Delphi. A further 118 EPAs were discarded after the second Delphi round, leaving 49 final EPAs, across 9 subspecialties in orthopaedic surgery.
conclusionsExpert consensus was used to create a list of EPAs considered mandatory for completion of resident training in orthopaedics in our province. The final 49 peer-reviewed EPAs will be a valuable benchmark in curriculum design and assessment in orthopaedic surgery in the competency-based era for other programs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.