Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34056392›Full record

ArticleACS omega2021

Environmental Sustainability Evaluation of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Synthesized via Green Synthesis and the Coprecipitation Method: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Study.

David Alfonso Patiño-Ruiz, Samir Isaac Meramo-Hurtado, Ángel Dario González-Delgado, Adriana Herrera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A life cycle risk assessment of nanopesticides in freshwater.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Second phase CuRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  12. Biofabrication of FeMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Alfonso Patiño-RuizPrograma de Doctorado en Ingeniería, Grupo de Nanomateriales e Ingeniería de Procesos Asistida por Computador, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena 130010, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6683-8557
Samir Isaac Meramo-HurtadoPrograma de Doctorado en Ingeniería, Grupo de Nanomateriales e Ingeniería de Procesos Asistida por Computador, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena 130010, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9350-9898
Ángel Dario González-DelgadoPrograma de Doctorado en Ingeniería, Grupo de Nanomateriales e Ingeniería de Procesos Asistida por Computador, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena 130010, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-8100-8888
Adriana HerreraPrograma de Doctorado en Ingeniería, Grupo de Nanomateriales e Ingeniería de Procesos Asistida por Computador, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena 130010, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4355-3401

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green synthesis, based on green chemistry, is replacing the traditional methods, aiming to contribute with an enhanced environmental sustainability, which can be achieved using nontoxic compounds from biological resources, such as natural extracts from plants. In this study, the life cycle assessment (LCA) of iron oxide nanoparticles prepared through the green synthesis and the coprecipitation method is reported by following a cradle-to-gate approach. The LCA allowed quantifying and normalized the environmental impacts produced by the green synthesis (1.0 × 10

Identifiers

PMID34056392
PMCPMC8154134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.