Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34056383›Full record

ArticleACS omega2021

Quantitative Toxicity Prediction via Meta Ensembling of Multitask Deep Learning Models.

Abdul Karim, Vahid Riahi, Avinash Mishra, M A Hakim Newton, Abdollah Dehzangi, Thomas Balle, Abdul Sattar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Toxicological Sciences.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdul KarimSchool of Information Communication Technology, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane 4111, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4431-7507
Vahid RiahiSchool of Information Communication Technology, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane 4111, Australia.
Avinash MishraDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas 110016, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4125-6670
M A Hakim NewtonInstitute of Integrated and Intelligent Systems, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane 4111, Australia.
Abdollah DehzangiDepartment of Computer Science, Rutgers University Camden, Camden 08102, New Jersey, United States.
Thomas BalleSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, New South Wales, Australia.
Abdul SattarInstitute of Integrated and Intelligent Systems, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane 4111, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicity prediction using quantitative structure-activity relationship has achieved significant progress in recent years. However, most existing machine learning methods in toxicity prediction utilize only one type of feature representation and one type of neural network, which essentially restricts their performance. Moreover, methods that use more than one type of feature representation struggle with the aggregation of information captured within the features since they use predetermined aggregation formulas. In this paper, we propose a deep learning framework for quantitative toxicity prediction using five individual base deep learning models and their own base feature representations. We then propose to adopt a meta ensemble approach using another separate deep learning model to perform aggregation of the outputs of the individual base deep learning models. We train our deep learning models in a weighted multitask fashion combining four quantitative toxicity data sets of LD

Identifiers

PMID34056383
PMCPMC8154128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.