Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34056148›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery protocols2021

Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation Combined with Therapeutic Exercises in Patients with Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Sukumar Shanmugam, Lawrence Mathias, Nagarajan Manickaraj, K U Dhanesh Kumar, Praveen Kumar Kandakurti, Sathees Kumar Dorairaj, Ramprasad Muthukrishnan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06604962 (Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation Using Inverse Electrodes Placement on Electromyographic Activity and Pressure Pain Threshold in the Upper Trapezius With Trigger Points - A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06604962 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation Using Inverse Electrodes Placement on Electromyographic Activity and Pressure Pain Threshold in the Upper Trapezius With Trigger Points - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGulf Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled36ConditionsMyofacial Pain SyndromeArmsIMES using IEP, IMES using CEP, Sham-IMES
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sukumar ShanmugamCollege of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6075-366X
Lawrence MathiasK S Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte Deemed to be University, Mangaluru, India.
Nagarajan ManickarajMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
K U Dhanesh KumarNitte Institute of Physiotherapy, Nitte Deemed to be University, Mangaluru, India.
Praveen Kumar KandakurtiCollege of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2669-4488
Sathees Kumar DorairajCollege of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6962-8168
Ramprasad MuthukrishnanCollege of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Gulf Medical University · AEGriffith University · AUK S Hegde Medical Academy · INNitte University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyofascial trigger points (MTrPs) precipitate the shoulder pain severity and disability in patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis (SAC). This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intramuscular electrical stimulation (IMES) combined with therapeutic exercises versus dry needling (DN) combined with therapeutic exercises in improving the clinical outcomes in patients with SAC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this randomized controlled trial, IMES (n = 45) and DN (43) groups had received respectively IMES, and DN twice weekly for three consecutive weeks. Both groups received therapeutic exercises 1520 minutes, five days in a week during the second and third week. Pain, disability, kinesiophobia, number of active and latent MTrPs, shoulder abduction and external rotation range of motion were assessed at baseline, week-1, week-2, week-3 and follow-up at 3 months. A repeated measures ANOVA performed to find out the significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the groups.

resultsThe results of repeated measures of ANOVA shows that the post intervention timelines assessment scores of VAS, DASH, shoulder abduction and external rotation ROM, number of active and latent MTrPs and kinesiophobia were significantly (p. < 0.05) improved in both groups. However, IMES group had achieved a greater improvement over DN group (p. < 0.05) on the shoulder pain severity and disability, shoulder range of motion, number of active and latent MTrPs and kinesiophobia. Despite the significant statistical differences between the groups, IMES group did not achieve the minimal clinically important differences of 1.5cm and 11-points respectively for the VAS and DASH scores. No serious adverse effects occurred during the three weeks of treatment.

conclusionIMES combined with therapeutic exercises is an effective treatment to reduce the shoulder pain severity and upper limb disability by deactivating the active and latent MTrPs and improving the shoulder abduction and external rotation range of motion in patients with SAC.

Indexed as

adhesive capsulitisDry needlingElectrical stimulationfrozen shoulderMyofascial painShoulder exercisesshoulder painTrigger points

Identifiers

PMID34056148
PMCPMC8139297
OpenAlexW3162825529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.