Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34056144›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in electrochemistry2021

Recent Advances in Potentiometric Biosensing.

Nicole L Walker, Anastasiya B Roshkolaeva, Andrei I Chapoval, Jeffrey E Dick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in electrochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Strategic Detection ofBiosensors · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Revolutionizing food safety with electrochemical biosensors for rapid and portable pathogen detection.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Surface-modified CMOS biosensors.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicole L WalkerDepartment of Chemistry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Anastasiya B RoshkolaevaRussian-American Anti-Cancer Center, Altai State University, Barnaul, 656049, Russia.
Andrei I ChapovalRussian-American Anti-Cancer Center, Altai State University, Barnaul, 656049, Russia.
Jeffrey E DickDepartment of Chemistry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Funding

Nanoelectrochemistry and Single Cell MetabolomicsR35GM138133 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Jeffrey E Dick · 2020 to 2026
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potentiometric biosensors are incredibly versatile tools with budding uses in industry, security, environmental safety, and human health. This mini-review on recent (2018-2020) advances in the field of potentiometric biosensors is intended to give a general overview of the main types of potentiometric biosensors for novices while still providing a brief but thorough summary of the novel advances and trends for experienced practitioners. These trends include the incorporation of nanomaterials, graphene, and novel immobilization materials, as well as a strong push towards miniaturized, flexible, and self-powered devices for in-field or at-home use.

Indexed as

Biofuel cellsBiosensorsField effect transistorsFlexible sensorsPotentiometry

Identifiers

PMID34056144
PMCPMC8162913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.