Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34056133›Full record

ArticleRomanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care2020

Clinical Practice: Should we Radically Alter our Sedation of Critical Care Patients, Especially Given the COVID-19 Pandemics?

D Longrois, F Petitjeans, O Simonet, M de Kock, M Belliveau, C Pichot, Th Lieutaud, M Ghignone, L Quintin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Combining OJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D LongroisDépartements d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Université Paris-Diderot and Paris VII Sorbonne-Paris-Cité, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and UMR 5698, Paris, France.
F PetitjeansHôpital d'Instruction des Armées Desgenettes, Lyon, France.
O SimonetCentre Hospitalier de Wallonie Picarde, Tournai, Belgium.
M de KockCentre Hospitalier de Wallonie Picarde, Tournai, Belgium.
M BelliveauHôpital de St Jerome, St Jérôme, Québec, Canada.
C PichotHôpital Louis Pasteur, Dole, France.
Th LieutaudHôpital de Bourg en Bresse Bourg-en-Bresse France.
M GhignoneJ.F. Kennedy Hospital North Campus, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA.
L QuintinHôpital d'Instruction des Armées Desgenettes, Lyon, France.
Centre Hospitalier de Wallonie Picarde · BEHôpital d'instruction des Armées Desgenettes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high number of patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus requiring care for ARDS puts sedation in the critical care unit (CCU) to the edge. Depth of sedation has evolved over the last 40 years (no-sedation, deep sedation, daily emergence, minimal sedation, etc.). Most guidelines now recommend determining the depth of sedation and minimizing the use of benzodiazepines and opioids. The broader use of alpha-2 adrenergic agonists ('alpha-2 agonists') led to sedation regimens beginning at admission to the CCU that contrast with hypnotics+opioids ("conventional" sedation), with major consequences for cognition, ventilation and circulatory performance. The same doses of alpha-2 agonists used for 'cooperative' sedation (ataraxia, analgognosia) elicit no respiratory depression but modify the autonomic nervous system (cardiac parasympathetic activation, attenuation of excessive cardiac and vasomotor sympathetic activity). Alpha-2 agonists should be selected only in patients who benefit from their effects ('personalized' indications, as opposed to a 'one size fits all' approach). Then, titration to effect is required, especially in the setting of systemic hypotension and/or hypovolemia. Since no general guidelines exist for the use of alpha-2 agonists for CCU sedation, our clinical experience is summarized for the benefit of physicians in clinical situations in which a recommendation might never exist (refractory delirium tremens; unstable, hypovolemic, hypotensive patients, etc.). Because the physiology of alpha-2 receptors and the pharmacology of alpha-2 agonists lead to personalized indications, some details are offered. Since interactions between conventional sedatives and alpha-2 agonists have received little attention, these interactions are addressed. Within the existing guidelines for CCU sedation, this article could facilitate the use of alpha-2 agonists as effective and safe sedation while awaiting large, multicentre trials and more evidence-based medicine.

Indexed as

alpha-2 adrenergic agonistsalpha-2 agonistsclonidineconventional sedationcooperative sedationCritical caredexmedetomidinegeneral anaesthesiaguanfacinesedation

Identifiers

PMID34056133
PMCPMC8158317
OpenAlexW3119364561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.