Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34056058›Full record

ArticleSurgery research and practice2021

A Fast and Reliable Method to Interpret Short-Term Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Red Cell Distribution Width is Sensitive and Specific.

Okan Murat Akturk, Mikail Çakır, Yaşar Murat Vardar, Doğan Yıldırım, Muzaffer Akıncı

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Okan Murat AkturkDepartment of Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0759-3756
Mikail ÇakırDepartment of Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yaşar Murat VardarDepartment of Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Doğan YıldırımDepartment of Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muzaffer AkıncıDepartment of Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeptic ulcer is an important health problem worldwide with a prevalence of around 5%. Peptic ulcer perforation is a potentially mortal complication of peptic ulcer disease. We aimed to investigate the potential use of red cell distribution width as a prognostic marker in peptic ulcer perforation.

methodsThe files, operation notes, biochemical and hematological parameters, and prognosis of patients who were operated for a peptic ulcer perforation were reviewed in a retrospective cohort study. The relation of red cell distribution width (RDW) to main outcome in-hospital mortality was assessed.

resultsThe mean age of the 172 patients was 40 ± 17.89. There were 158 (92%) males and 14 (8%) females. The in-hospital mortality was 8.7% (15/172). The median RDW in the group with mortality was 15.00 (interquartile range (IQR): 14.30-17.20) compared with the median RDW in the group with no mortality as 13.2 (IQR: 12.80-14.00,

conclusionIncreased RDW may be of use to interpret mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation.

Identifiers

PMID34056058
PMCPMC8149252
OpenAlexW3161814872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.