Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34055835›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021

Protein Extraction From FFPE Kidney Tissue Samples: A Review of the Literature and Characterization of Techniques.

Maria García-Vence, Maria Del Pilar Chantada-Vazquez, Ana Sosa-Fajardo, Rebeca Agra, Ana Barcia de la Iglesia, Alfonso Otero-Glez, Miguel García-González, José M Cameselle-Teijeiro, Cristina Nuñez, Juan J Bravo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maria García-VenceProteomic Unit, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Maria Del Pilar Chantada-VazquezProteomic Unit, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Ana Sosa-FajardoResearch Group of Industrial Microbiology and Food Biotechnology (IMDO), Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium.
Rebeca AgraProteomic Unit, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Ana Barcia de la IglesiaNephrology Laboratory, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Alfonso Otero-GlezNephrology Service, University Clinical Hospital of Ourense (CHOU), Orense, Spain.
Miguel García-GonzálezNephrology Laboratory, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
José M Cameselle-TeijeiroDepartment of Pathology, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Santiago, Spain.
Cristina NuñezResearch Unit, Lucus Augusti University Hospital (HULA), Servizo Galego de Saúde (SERGAS), Lugo, Spain.
Juan J BravoNephrology Service, University Clinical Hospital of Vigo (Alvaro Cunqueiro-CHUVI), Vigo, Spain.
Susana B BravoProteomic Unit, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most tissue biopsies from patients in hospital environments are formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) for long-term storage. This fixation process produces a modification in the proteins called "crosslinks", which improves protein stability necessary for their conservation. Currently, these samples are mainly used in clinical practice for performing immunohistochemical analysis, since these modifications do not suppose a drawback for this technique; however, crosslinks difficult the protein extraction process. Accordingly, these modifications make the development of a good protein extraction protocol necessary. Due to the specific characteristics of each tissue, the same extraction buffers or deparaffinization protocols are not equally effective in all cases. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain a specific protocol for each tissue. The present work aims to establish a deparaffinization and protein extraction protocol from FFPE kidney samples to obtain protein enough of high quality for the subsequent proteomic analysis. Different deparaffination, protocols and protein extraction buffers will be tested in FFPE kidney samples. The optimized conditions will be applied in the identification by LC-MS/MS analysis of proteins extracted from 5, 10, and 15 glomeruli obtained through the microdissection of FFPE renal samples.

Indexed as

deparaffinizationformalin-fixed paraffin-embeddedkidney tissueLC-MS/MS analysisprotein extraction

Identifiers

PMID34055835
PMCPMC8158658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.