Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34055725›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health

A Review of COVID-19 Mass Testing in the United Arab Emirates.

Farida Al-Hosani, Shereena Al-Mazrouei, Shammah Al-Memari, Zain Al-Yafei, Marília Silva Paulo, Erik Koornneef

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Heterogeneity in testing for infectious diseases.Royal Society open science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Farida Al-HosaniAbu Dhabi Public Health Center, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Shereena Al-MazroueiAbu Dhabi Public Health Center, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Shammah Al-MemariAbu Dhabi Public Health Center, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Zain Al-YafeiAbu Dhabi Health Services Company - SEHA, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Marília Silva PauloCollege of Medicine & Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Erik KoornneefCollege of Medicine & Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appropriate diagnostic testing to identify persons infected with SARS-COV-2 is a vital part of a health system's ability to control the global pandemic of COVID-19 disease. The primary purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the mass testing strategy implemented throughout the UAE and the overall impact it has made on containing and controlling the spread of the disease. This study describes the mass testing strategy and capacity of the UAE during the pandemic of the new coronavirus SARS-COV-2. The UAE has conducted 15 million polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests to SARS-COV-2, as of 15 November 2020. The number of tests per day varied from 10,000 by the end of March to 120,000 tests per day in November 2020. The mass testing initiative across the entire UAE forms an integral part of a bigger strategy focusing on testing, tracing contacts and isolating positive cases.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United Arab EmiratesCOVID-19mass testing strategypublic health policypublic health strategySARS-CoV-2United Arab Emirates

Identifiers

PMID34055725
PMCPMC8149747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.