Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34055626›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Individualized Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients with Brain Metastases After Stereotactic Radiosurgery Utilizing Driver Gene Mutations and Volumetric Surrogates.

Cheng Zhou, Changguo Shan, Mingyao Lai, Zhaoming Zhou, Junjie Zhen, Guanhua Deng, Hainan Li, Juan Li, Chen Ren, Jian Wang and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Cheng ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Changguo ShanDepartment of Oncology, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Mingyao LaiDepartment of Oncology, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Zhaoming ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Junjie ZhenDepartment of Oncology, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Guanhua DengDepartment of Oncology, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Hainan LiDepartment of Pathology, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Juan LiDepartment of Oncology, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Chen RenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ming LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Liang ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Taihua WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Dan ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Feng-Ming Spring KongDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Longhua ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Linbo CaiDepartment of Oncology, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Lei WenDepartment of Oncology, Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well-known that genomic mutational analysis plays a significant role in patients with NSCLC for personalized treatment. Given the increasing use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM), there is an emerging need for more precise assessment of survival outcomes after SRS. Patients with BM and treated by SRS were eligible in this study. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Cox regression models were used to identify independent prognostic factors. A survival predictive nomogram was developed and evaluated by Concordance-index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), and calibration curve. From January 2016 to December 2019, a total of 356 BM patients were eligible. The median OS was 17.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.5-19.9] and the actual OS at 1- and 2-years measured 63.2 and 37.6%, respectively. A nomogram for OS was developed by incorporating four independent prognostic factors: Karnofsky Performance Score, cumulative tumor volume, gene mutation status, and serum lactate dehydrogenase. The nomogram was validated in a separate cohort and demonstrated good calibration and good discriminative ability (C-index = 0.780, AUC = 0.784). The prognostic accuracy of the nomogram (0.792) was considerably enhanced when compared with classical prognostic indices, including the Graded Prognostic Assessment (0.708), recursive partitioning analysis (0.587), and the SRS (0.536). Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in OS among the stratified low-, median- and high-risk groups (

Indexed as

brain metastasesgene mutationnomogramprediction modelstereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID34055626
PMCPMC8158152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.