Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34055596›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Clinical Implementation of Proton Therapy Using Pencil-Beam Scanning Delivery Combined With Static Apertures.

Christian Bäumer, Sandija Plaude, Dalia Ahmad Khalil, Dirk Geismar, Paul-Heinz Kramer, Kevin Kröninger, Christian Nitsch, Jörg Wulff, Beate Timmermann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Use of apertures in single-energy pristine Bragg peak FLASH radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. External Beam Radiotherapy in the Management of Uveal Melanoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Future of Radioactive Medicine.Radiation research · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christian BäumerWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.
Sandija PlaudeWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.
Dalia Ahmad KhalilWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.
Dirk GeismarWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.
Paul-Heinz KramerWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.
Kevin KröningerFaculty of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Christian NitschFaculty of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Jörg WulffWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.
Beate TimmermannWest German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.
West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DETU Dortmund University · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proton therapy makes use of the favorable depth-dose distribution with its characteristic Bragg peak to spare normal tissue distal of the target volume. A steep dose gradient would be desired in lateral dimensions, too. The widespread spot scanning delivery technique is based, however, on pencil-beams with in-air spot full-widths-at-half-maximum of typically 1 cm or more. This hampers the sparing of organs-at-risk if small-scale structures adjacent to the target volume are concerned. The trimming of spot scanning fields with collimating apertures constitutes a simple measure to increase the transversal dose gradient. The current study describes the clinical implementation of brass apertures in conjunction with the pencil-beam scanning delivery mode at a horizontal, clinical treatment head based on commercial hardware and software components. Furthermore, clinical cases, which comprised craniopharyngiomas, re-irradiations and ocular tumors, were evaluated. The dosimetric benefits of 31 treatment plans using apertures were compared to the corresponding plans without aperture. Furthermore, an overview of the radiation protection aspects is given. Regarding the results, robust optimization considering range and setup uncertainties was combined with apertures. The treatment plan optimizations followed a single-field uniform dose or a restricted multi-field optimization approach. Robustness evaluation was expanded to account for possible deviations of the center of the pencil-beam delivery and the mechanical center of the aperture holder. Supplementary apertures improved the conformity index on average by 15.3%. The volume of the dose gradient surrounding the PTV (evaluated between 80 and 20% dose levels) was decreased on average by 17.6%. The mean dose of the hippocampi could be reduced on average by 2.9 GyRBE. In particular cases the apertures facilitated a sparing of an organ-at-risk, e.g. the eye lens or the brainstem. For six craniopharyngioma cases the inclusion of apertures led to a reduction of the mean dose of 1.5 GyRBE (13%) for the brain and 3.1 GyRBE (16%) for the hippocampi.

Indexed as

aperturebrain tumorsocular tumorspencil-beam scanningproton therapyquality assuranceradiation protection

Identifiers

PMID34055596
PMCPMC8149965
OpenAlexW3160699431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.