Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34055420›Full record

ArticleCase reports in critical care2021

The Considerations and Controversies in Using High-Flow Nasal Oxygen with Self-Prone Positioning in SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 Disease.

Kieran P Nunn, Murray J Blackstock, Ryan Ellis, Gauhar Sheikh, Alastair Morgan, Jonathan K J Rhodes

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in critical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kieran P NunnIntensive Care Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3118-9024
Murray J BlackstockIntensive Care Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
Ryan EllisIntensive Care Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
Gauhar SheikhIntensive Care Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
Alastair MorganIntensive Care Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
Jonathan K J RhodesIntensive Care Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
Western General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence exists for the use of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) in the general critical care population for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. There is discord between guidelines for hypoxemia management in COVID-19. Both noninvasive management and intubation present risk to patients and staff and potentially overwhelm hospital mechanical ventilator capacity. The use of HFNO has been particularly controversial in the UK, with oxygen infrastructure failure. We discuss our experience of managing COVID-19 with HFNO and awake self-prone positioning. We focus upon the less-usual case of an eighteen-year-old female to illustrate the type of patient where HFNO may be used when perhaps earlier intubation once was. It is important to consider the wider implications of intubation. We have used HFNO as a bridge to intubation or as definitive management. As we await clinical trial evidence, HFNO with self-prone positioning has a role in COVID-19 for certain patients. Response parameters must be set and reviewed, oxygen infrastructure considered, and potential staff droplet exposure minimised.

Identifiers

PMID34055420
PMCPMC8142809
OpenAlexW3164554650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.