Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34055329›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2021

The perfect storm: Disruptions to institutional delivery care arising from the COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal.

K C Ashish, Stefan Swartling Peterson, Rejina Gurung, Alkistis Skalkidou, Jageshwar Gautam, Honey Malla, Punya Paudel, Kumari Bhattarai, Nisha Joshi, Bhim Singh Tinkari and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

K C AshishDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Stefan Swartling PetersonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Rejina GurungDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Alkistis SkalkidouDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Jageshwar GautamMinistry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Honey MallaResearch Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Punya PaudelFamily Welfare Division, Department of Health Services, Nepal.
Kumari BhattaraiFamily Welfare Division, Department of Health Services, Nepal.
Nisha JoshiFamily Welfare Division, Department of Health Services, Nepal.
Bhim Singh TinkariFamily Welfare Division, Department of Health Services, Nepal.
Shree AdhikariParopakar Maternity and Women's Hospital, Nepal.
Durgalaxmi ShresthaBheri Hospital, Nepalgunj, Nepal.
Binda GhimireNepal Nursing Council, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Seema SharmaSeti Provincial Hospital, Dhangadi, Nepal.
Laxmi KhanalWhite Ribbon Alliance Nepal, Kathmandu.
Sunil ShresthaWhite Ribbon Alliance Nepal, Kathmandu.
Wendy Jane GrahamLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Mary KinneySchool of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to system-wide disruption of health services globally. We assessed the effect of the pandemic on the disruption of institutional delivery care in Nepal.

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study among 52 356 women in nine hospitals to assess the disruption of institutional delivery care during the pandemic (comparing March to August in 2019 with the same months in 2020). We also conducted a nested follow up cohort study with 2022 women during the pandemic to assess their provision and experience of respectful care. We used linear regression models to assess the association between provision and experience of care with volume of hospital births and women's residence in a COVID-19 hotspot area.

resultsThe mean institutional births during the pandemic across the nine hospitals was 24 563, an average decrease of 11.6% (

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has had differential effects on maternity services with changes varying by the volume of births per hospital with smaller volume facilities doing better. More research is needed to investigate the effects of the pandemic on where women give birth and their provision and experience of respectful maternity care to inform a "building-back-better" approach in post-pandemic period.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricPandemicsAdultCOVID-19FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalsHumansMaternal Health ServicesNepalPregnancyProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34055329
PMCPMC8141327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.