ReviewInterface focus2021
Cross-species comparisons and
Review in Interface focus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative engineering approaches to model host-microbiome interactions in vitro.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2025Review
- Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies Menin and SUZ12 as regulators of human developmental timing.Nature cell biology · 2025Article
- Dynamics in zebrafish development define transcriptomic specificity after angiogenesis inhibitor exposure.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
- A mathematical framework for measuring and tuning tempo in developmental gene regulatory networks.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- The stem cell zoo for comparative studies of developmental tempo.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024Review
- Efficient derivation of transgene-free porcine induced pluripotent stem cells enables in vitro modeling of species-specific developmental timing.Stem cell reports · 2023Article
- Fgf signalling triggers an intrinsic mesodermal timer that determines the duration of limb patterning.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The Relevance of Time in Biological Scaling.Biology · 2023Review
- Periodic formation of epithelial somites from human pluripotent stem cells.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Retinoic acid influences the timing and scaling of avian wing development.Cell reports · 2022Article
- The vertebrate Embryo Clock: Common players dancing to a different beat.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Signalling dynamics in embryonic development.The Biochemical journal · 2021Review
- Scalable control of developmental timetables by epigenetic switching networks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- From Cell States to Cell Fates: How Cell Proliferation and Neuronal Differentiation Are Coordinated During Embryonic Development.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time is inherent to biological processes. It determines the order of events and the speed at which they take place. However, we still need to refine approaches to measure the course of time in biological systems and understand what controls the pace of development. Here, we argue that the comparison of biological processes across species provides molecular insight into the timekeeping mechanisms in biology. We discuss recent findings and the open questions in the field and highlight the use of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.