Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34055180›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2021

An Assessment of Mobile Applications Designed to Address Physical Activity During Pregnancy and Postpartum.

Rachel A Tinius, Mackenzie Polston, Hannah Bradshaw, Paula Ashley, Ashley Greene, Angel N Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Pregnancy Apps for Self-Monitoring: Scoping Review of the Most Popular Global Apps Available in Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel A TiniusKinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
Mackenzie PolstonKinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
Hannah BradshawKinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
Paula AshleyKinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
Ashley GreeneKinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
Angel N ParkerKinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only 15% of women meet physical activity guidelines during and after pregnancy despite the well-established positive impacts on both the mother and the neonate. There is a clear lack of guidance on this topic, and mobile health interventions are a promising direction for future interventions to facilitate a necessary increase in physical activity during pregnancy and postpartum. The purpose of the study was to objectively assess the quality and perceived impact of existing free mobile apps that are designed to cover physical activity during and after pregnancy. The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) was used by two independent reviewers to determine overall quality of mobile apps freely available in the U.S. iTunes store. The initial search for pregnancy and postpartum physical activity apps yielded 732 results. After careful screening, 567 apps were excluded, leaving 165 that went under further screening procedures. Upon further screening, 54 apps were downloaded and scored using the MARS system. Of the 54 apps included in the analyses, 20 apps contained physical activity information for pregnant women (37.0%), 11 apps contained information for postpartum women (20.4%), and 23 apps contained information pertaining to both pregnant and postpartum women (42.6%). Of note, 33 (61.1%) of the apps required hidden costs in the form of in-app purchases. The mean overall MARS score was 3.06 ± 0.94 out of 5 (1-

Indexed as

exercisemhealthmobile applicationsperinatalpostnatalpregnant

Identifiers

PMID34055180
PMCPMC8136604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.