Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34055179›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2021

Ordinal Statistical Models of Physical Activity Levels from Accelerometer Data.

Shafayet S Hossain, Drew M Lazar, Munni Begum

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shafayet S HossainDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA.
Drew M LazarDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA.
Munni BegumDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA.
Ball State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvements in accelerometer technology has led to new types of data on which more powerful predictive models can be built to assess physical activity. This paper explains and implements ordinal random forest and partial proportional odds models which both take into account the ordinality of responses given explanatory accelerometer data. The data analyzed comes from 28 adults performing activities of daily living in two visits while wearing accelerometers on the ankle, hip, right and left wrist. The first visit provided training data and the second testing data so that an independent sample, cross-validation approach could be used. We found that ordinal random forest produces similar accuracy rates and better linearly weighted kappa values than random forest. On the testing set, the ankle produced the best accuracy rates (33.3%), followed by the left wrist (34.7%), hip (36.9%) and then the right wrist (37.3%) using the best performing decision model for a four-activity level response. Linearly weighted kappa values indicated substantial agreement. For a two-activity level response, the error rates on the ankle, hip, left wrist and right wrist were 15.5%, 15.9%, 16.5% and 18.8%, respectively. The partial proportional odds model had significant goodness of fit (

Indexed as

classificationmachine learningordinal forestPhysiologyregression trees

Identifiers

PMID34055179
PMCPMC8136605
OpenAlexW3151438024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.