Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34055172›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2021

Acute Effects of Foam Rolling on Cycling Performance: A Randomized Cross-Over Study.

Júlio Benvenutti Bueno DE Camargo, Paulo Henrique Barbosa, Matheus Correa Moraes, Tiago Volpi Braz, Felipe Alves Brigatto, Danilo Rodrigues Batista, Guilherme Borsseti Businari, Charlini Simoni Hartz, Ricardo Adamoli Simões, Marcelo Saldanha Aoki and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Júlio Benvenutti Bueno DE CamargoHuman Performance Research Laboratory, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, São Paulo, BRAZIL.
Paulo Henrique BarbosaHuman Performance Research Laboratory, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, São Paulo, BRAZIL.
Matheus Correa MoraesHuman Performance Research Laboratory, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, São Paulo, BRAZIL.
Tiago Volpi BrazHuman Performance Research Laboratory, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, São Paulo, BRAZIL.
Felipe Alves BrigattoHuman Performance Research Laboratory, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, São Paulo, BRAZIL.
Danilo Rodrigues BatistaHuman Performance Research Laboratory, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, São Paulo, BRAZIL.
Guilherme Borsseti BusinariHuman Performance Research Laboratory, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, São Paulo, BRAZIL.
Charlini Simoni HartzHuman Performance Research Laboratory, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, São Paulo, BRAZIL.
Ricardo Adamoli SimõesHuman Performance Research Laboratory, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, São Paulo, BRAZIL.
Marcelo Saldanha AokiSchool of Arts, Sciences, and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, BRAZIL.
Charles Ricardo LopesHuman Performance Research Laboratory, Methodist University of Piracicaba, Piracicaba, São Paulo, BRAZIL.
Methodist University of Piracicaba · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute foam rolling protocols may increase range of motion without a negative impact on muscle performance. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate the acute effects of foam rolling on cycling performance (mean power and maximal power), affect and perceived exertion. A secondary aim was to assess the effect of foam rolling on post-exercise muscle soreness. In a random order, ten recreationally trained cyclists (age: 26 ± 5 years; height 1.76 ± 0.06 m; total body mass 78.3 ± 19.8 kg; cycling experience: 5.6 ± 5.3 years; 4.1 ± 1.3 cycling sessions per week and 1.4 ± 1.4 strength sessions per week) were submitted to the following experimental conditions (separated by one week) before performing a three-minute, all-out cycling test: foam rolling or control. During foam rolling protocol, participants were instructed to roll back and forth on one leg and to place the opposite leg crossed over, from the proximal to the distal portion of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis during one set of sixty seconds for each muscle group. Feeling scale (10 min pre and post-test), CR-10 scale of perceived exertion (ten-minute post-test), pressure pain threshold (pre and 24 h post-test) and mean/maximal power were assessed. No significant differences were observed between conditions for mean and maximal power, affect, perceived exertion, and pressure pain threshold (all

Indexed as

Cyclistsself-myofascial releasesports performance

Identifiers

PMID34055172
PMCPMC8136556
OpenAlexW3137121842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.