Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34055041›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021

Feature Selection and Classification of Clinical Datasets Using Bioinspired Algorithms and Super Learner.

S Murugesan, R S Bhuvaneswaran, H Khanna Nehemiah, S Keerthana Sankari, Y Nancy Jane

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S MurugesanRamanujan Computing Centre, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1140-3641
R S BhuvaneswaranRamanujan Computing Centre, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India.
H Khanna NehemiahRamanujan Computing Centre, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3984-7490
S Keerthana SankariDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India.
Y Nancy JaneDepartment of Computer Technology, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India.
Anna University, Chennai · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system that employs a super learner to diagnose the presence or absence of a disease has been developed. Each clinical dataset is preprocessed and split into training set (60%) and testing set (40%). A wrapper approach that uses three bioinspired algorithms, namely, cat swarm optimization (CSO), krill herd (KH) ,and bacterial foraging optimization (BFO) with the classification accuracy of support vector machine (SVM) as the fitness function has been used for feature selection. The selected features of each bioinspired algorithm are stored in three separate databases. The features selected by each bioinspired algorithm are used to train three back propagation neural networks (BPNN) independently using the conjugate gradient algorithm (CGA). Classifier testing is performed by using the testing set on each trained classifier, and the diagnostic results obtained are used to evaluate the performance of each classifier. The classification results obtained for each instance of the testing set of the three classifiers and the class label associated with each instance of the testing set will be the candidate instances for training and testing the super learner. The training set comprises of 80% of the instances, and the testing set comprises of 20% of the instances. Experimentation has been carried out using seven clinical datasets from the University of California Irvine (UCI) machine learning repository. The super learner has achieved a classification accuracy of 96.83% for Wisconsin diagnostic breast cancer dataset (WDBC), 86.36% for Statlog heart disease dataset (SHD), 94.74% for hepatocellular carcinoma dataset (HCC), 90.48% for hepatitis dataset (HD), 81.82% for vertebral column dataset (VCD), 84% for Cleveland heart disease dataset (CHD), and 70% for Indian liver patient dataset (ILP).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, HepatocellularComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansLiver NeoplasmsMachine LearningMaleNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID34055041
PMCPMC8149240
OpenAlexW3160483489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.