Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34055038›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021

Comparison of Dizziness Factors for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with and without Dizziness: A Factor Analysis and Propensity Score Model Study.

Hon-Ping Ma, Jiann Ruey Ong, Ju-Chi Ou, Yung-Hsiao Chiang, Shoou-Yang Lian

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hon-Ping MaEmergency Department, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7568-1451
Jiann Ruey OngEmergency Department, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0778-8761
Ju-Chi OuEmergency Department, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3549-7283
Yung-Hsiao ChiangDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8426-4016
Shoou-Yang LianDepartment of Emergency, Yuan's General Hospital, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2273-3235
Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TWYuan's General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes major socioeconomic problems worldwide. In the United States, nearly three-quarters of patients with TBI have mild TBI (mTBI). 32% of these patients may develop dizziness. In this study, we analyzed the factor structure of the traditional Chinese version of the DHI and evaluate the differences in DHI factors between dizziness and nondizziness groups. In total, 315 patients with mTBI, comprising 158 with self-reported dizziness and 157 without dizziness, were recruited from three hospitals. The responses for Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) demonstrated between-group differences. The Chinese DHI had internal validity and had four factors that differed from the English version (3 aspects). The group effects for the physical subscale remained significantly different even after adjustments in the propensity score model. For the Chinese version, two of four factors remained significantly different in the effects between self-reported dizziness and nondizziness groups. The factors of our Chinese DHI differed from those of the original English version of DHI. After adjustments using the propensity score model, the physical subscale demonstrated significant differences between the self-reported dizziness and nondizziness groups. Only two factors from our Chinese DHI were significantly different; moreover, it contained only three physical, five functional, and three emotional items.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticComputational BiologyDisability EvaluationDizzinessFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID34055038
PMCPMC8131139
OpenAlexW3161625723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.