ReviewFrontiers in immunology2021
Autoantibodies in Rheumatoid Arthritis - Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular mechanisms and risk factors in rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive review.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in rheumatoid arthritis: current applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison and validation of systemic immune-inflammation index, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, and C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index for assessing disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Article
- Long-Term Outcomes in Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2026Article
- Proteomic and glycosylation biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis: advancing early diagnosis and precision therapy.Clinical proteomics · 2026Review
- Decoding the gut microbiota-immune dialogue: from bidirectional axis to therapeutic applications.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Identification of key factors for early detection of rheumatoid arthritis in primary care using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Blood-based epigenetic biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis: current knowledge and future perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Immunomodulatory effects of oral microbiota in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Precision medicine in rheumatoid arthritis: advances and clinical applications of multi-omics biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Peptidylarginine Deiminases: An Overview of Recent Advances in Citrullination Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein IgA antibodies in the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025Review
- The relation between clinical characteristics and mental health in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mitochondria as a Disease-Relevant Organelle in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Key Breakout in Fight Against the Disease.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Review
- Where Do We Stand in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis Ahead of EULAR/ACR 2025?Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Four Different Anti-CCP Assays for the Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Diagnostic Performance Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Tool to Eliminate IgM Immunoassay Interference.The AAPS journal · 2025Article
- Roles of Immunity and Endogenous Retroelements in the Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Treatment Strategies.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measurement of two groups of autoantibodies, rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA) have gained increasing significance in the diagnosis and classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over the last 65 years. Despite this rising importance of autoimmune serology in RA, there is a palpable lack of harmonization between different commercial RF and ACPA tests. While a minimal diagnostic specificity has been defined for RF tests, which almost always are related to an international reference preparation, neither of this applies to ACPA. Especially assays with low diagnostic specificity are associated with very low positive predictive values or post-test probabilities in real world settings. In this review we focus on issues of practical bearing for the clinical physician diagnosing patients who potentially have RA, or treating patients diagnosed with RA. We advocate that all clinically used assays for RF and ACPA should be aligned to a common diagnostic specificity of 98-99% compared to healthy controls. This high and rather narrow interval corresponds to the diagnostic specificity seen for many commercial ACPA tests, and represents a specificity that is higher than what is customary for most RF assays. Data on antibody occurrence harmonized in this way should be accompanied by test result-specific likelihood ratios for the target diagnosis RA on an ordinal or interval scale, which will provide the clinical physician with more granular and richer information than merely relating numerical values to a single cut-off point. As many physicians today are used to evaluate autoantibodies as positive or negative on a nominal scale, the introduction of test result-specific likelihood ratios will require a change in clinical mindset. We also discuss the use of autoantibodies to prognosticate future arthritis development in at-risk patients as well as predict severe disease course and outcome of pharmacological treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.