ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Acute Macular Neuroretinopathy in a Patient with Retinal Vascular Tortuosity.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute macular neuroretinopathy after Covid 19 in an eye with a congenital retinal macrovessel - a case report.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025Article
- Conjunctival lymphangiectasia and retinal angiopathy in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2022Article
- Acute Zonal Occult Outer Retinopathy in a Patient Suffering from Epilepsy: Five-Year Follow-Up.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a rare case of a young woman with acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN) in the right eye and concomitant retinal vascular tortuosity in both eyes. A 19-years-old woman presented with a sudden loss of central vision in the right eye. Apart from flu-like infection 2 weeks before the onset of symptoms, she reported overall good health. She used oral contraceptive pills. Multimodal imaging techniques including color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence, infrared reflectance imaging, fluorescein angiography, swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), and visual field assessment were used for the diagnosis of AMN as well as disease monitoring during follow-up. At presentation, ophthalmoscopy revealed a reddish parafoveal lesion, while SS-OCT showed hyper-reflectivity in the outer plexiform and outer nuclear layers with a slightly disrupted inner segment/outer segment junction. All these imaging findings indicated AMN, but the interpretation was slightly difficult due to the presence of tortuous retinal arteries in both eyes. During the disease course, functional and morphological recovery was documented at 1- and 6-month follow-up. However, as the abnormal appearance of the retinal vessels did not change, congenital retinal vascular tortuosity was diagnosed. Since the pathogenesis of AMN has not been fully elucidated, there is currently no effective treatment. Numerous studies have emphasized a vascular origin and the key role of ischemia in AMN. Our rare case suggests that congenital tortuosity of the retinal vessels, although constituting a common finding in healthy individuals, may be involved in the pathophysiology of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.