Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34054416›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Astrocytes and Adenosine A

Cátia R Lopes, Rodrigo A Cunha, Paula Agostinho

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. P2Y1 receptor in Alzheimer's disease.Neural regeneration research · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Adenosine AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Sleep and Perivascular Spaces.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. AFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cátia R LopesCenter for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Coimbra, Portugal.
Rodrigo A CunhaCenter for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Coimbra, Portugal.
Paula AgostinhoCenter for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Coimbra, Portugal.
University of Coimbra · PTCentro de Neurociências e Biologia Celular

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes, through their numerous processes, establish a bidirectional communication with neurons that is crucial to regulate synaptic plasticity, the purported neurophysiological basis of memory. This evidence contributed to change the classic "neurocentric" view of Alzheimer's disease (AD), being astrocytes increasingly considered a key player in this neurodegenerative disease. AD, the most common form of dementia in the elderly, is characterized by a deterioration of memory and of other cognitive functions. Although, early cognitive deficits have been associated with synaptic loss and dysfunction caused by amyloid-β peptides (Aβ), accumulating evidences support a role of astrocytes in AD. Astrocyte atrophy and reactivity occurring at early and later stages of AD, respectively, involve morphological alterations that translate into functional changes. However, the main signals responsible for astrocytic alterations in AD and their impact on synaptic function remain to be defined. One possible candidate is adenosine, which can be formed upon extracellular catabolism of ATP released by astrocytes. Adenosine can act as a homeostatic modulator and also as a neuromodulator at the synaptic level, through the activation of adenosine receptors, mainly of A

Indexed as

adenosine A2A receptorsAlzheimer’s diseaseamyloid-β proteinastrocyte reactivitycognitive deficitssynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID34054416
PMCPMC8155589
OpenAlexW3163201806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.