ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2021
Non-Healing Burn Wound Treatment With A Sterile Silicone Gel.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Feasibility Study Investigating a Topical Preparation as Novel Adjunct Treatment for the Symptomatic Management of Vulvovaginal Skin Conditions.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Review of History of Basic Principles of Burn Wound Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Film-Forming Wound Gel for Preterm Infant Skin Injuries: A Case Series.Case reports in dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of burn wounds can be complicated due to fluid and electrolyte loss and the increased chance of infectious complications. Silicone-based products have become increasingly used for non-healing wound treatment, but no study has specifically addressed its potential on burn patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of sterile silicone gel with conventional medication in improving the healing of burn wounds. Between November 2019 and March 2020, 12 patients with mid-deep and deep burn wounds were included in the present study (average TBSA approximately 29%, range 13-51%). Patient average age was 49 years (range 29-67 years), 7 were male. In each patient two clinically similar areas were identified and treated every 48 hours with topical application of silicone gel in the form of Stratamed® (Group 1) and conventional medication (Group 2). All the cases healed without requiring skin grafting. No secondary wound infection nor allergic reactions were found. The mean days from commencing the treatment to 95% re-epithelialization in Groups 1 and 2 were 5.4 and 12.5, respectively. Culture samples were negative for common pathogens. Silicone gel has shown to be particularly effective in speeding up the re-epithelialization process. The protective film formed by the silicone helps to reduce possible infectious complications. Finally, silicone gel is easy to apply and associated with greater pain control during medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34054387PMC8126373W3164983948What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.