Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34054382›Full record

ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2021

S Frigui, Y Bourbiaa, A Mokline, H Naija, A A Messadi, L Thabet

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Efficiency and Usefulness of the Molecular Test 'BiofireAnnals of burns and fire disasters · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S FriguiService de Biologie Médicale et Banque du Sang, Centre de Traumatologie et des Grands Brûlés, Tunisie.
Y BourbiaaService de Biologie Médicale et Banque du Sang, Centre de Traumatologie et des Grands Brûlés, Tunisie.
A MoklineService de Réanimation des Brûlés, Centre de Traumatologie et des Grands Brûlés, Tunisie.
H NaijaUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunisie.
A A MessadiService de Réanimation des Brûlés, Centre de Traumatologie et des Grands Brûlés, Tunisie.
L ThabetService de Biologie Médicale et Banque du Sang, Centre de Traumatologie et des Grands Brûlés, Tunisie.
Tunis El Manar University · TNFaculté de médecine de TunisTunis University · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nosocomial bacteremia (NB) is one of the most severe infections in burns in intensive care units. Their prognosis is worsened with the emergence and spread of multidrug resistant bacteria (MDR). Our retrospective study aimed to investigate clinical and bacteriological characteristics of NB occurring in patients hospitalized in the Trauma and Burn Center's Burn Unit (TBC-BU) in Tunisia, during a 3-year period (2016-2018). We found 261 NB in 216 patients, for a prevalence of 25.7% and an incidence density of 13.4‰ days of in-patient stay. The vast majority (88.9%) of NB occurred during the first 2 weeks of hospitalization. The catheterrelated bacteremia rate was 11.1%. P. æruginosa (20.2%) and A. baumannii (16.8%) were the 2 species most frequently isolated when S. aureus represented only 7.5% of isolates. Resistance rates were high, with 71% of P. æruginosa resistant to ceftazidime, 64% of S. aureus being MRSA, 69,5% of resistance to 3rd generation cephalosporins among Enterobacteriaceae, and colimycin remaining the only regularly active antibiotic (98%) on A. baumannii. The MDR rate was 44%, represented mainly by A. baumannii, ESBL-E and P. æruginosa. The mortality rate due to NB was 25%, with a significantly higher rate of MDR in fatal NB compared to that in NB with favorable outcome (p = 0,000019).

Identifiers

PMID34054382
PMCPMC8126372
OpenAlexW3163959137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.