Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34054348›Full record

ArticleEuropean sociological review2021

The Comparative Panel File: Harmonized Household Panel Surveys from Seven Countries.

Konrad Turek, Matthijs Kalmijn, Thomas Leopold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European sociological review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Konrad TurekNetherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI-KNAW/University of Groningen), Lange Houtstraat 19, NL-2511 CV The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9817-6797
Matthijs KalmijnNetherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI-KNAW/University of Groningen), Lange Houtstraat 19, NL-2511 CV The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5217-1897
Thomas LeopoldUniversity of Cologne, Institute of Sociology and Social Psychology, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Köln, Germany.

Funding

Health, Wealth, and Wellbeing over the Life Course and Across GenerationsR01AG040213 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FRIEDMAN, ESTHER M. · 2011 to 2025
$31.2M
Archiving, Enhancing, and Expanding the Cross-National Equivalent FileR03HD100924 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LILLARD, DEAN R · 2019 to 2020
$156k
Archiving the Cross-National Equivalent FileR03HD091871 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LILLARD, DEAN R · 2017 to 2018
$156k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040213NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD091871NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD100924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Comparative Panel File (CPF) harmonizes the world's largest and longest-running household panel surveys from seven countries: Australia (HILDA), Germany (SOEP), United Kingdom (BHPS and UKHLS), South Korea (KLIPS), Russia (RLMS), Switzerland (SHP), and the United States (PSID). The project aims to support the social science community in the analysis of comparative life course data. The CPF builds on the Cross-National Equivalent File but offers a larger range of variables, larger and more recent samples, an easier and more flexible workflow, and an open science platform for development. The CPF is not a data product but an open-source code that integrates individual and household panel data from all seven surveys into a harmonized three-level data structure. The CPF allows analysing individual trajectories, time trends, contextual effects, and country differences. The project is organized as an open science platform. The CPF version 1.0 contains 2.7 million observations from 360,000 respondents, covering the period from 1968 to 2019 and up to 40 panel waves per respondent. In this data brief, we present the background, design, and content of the CPF.

Identifiers

PMID34054348
PMCPMC8152217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.