Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34054180›Full record

ArticleJournal of analytical atomic spectrometry2019

Biological explorations with nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry.

Frank Gyngard, Matthew L Steinhauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of analytical atomic spectrometry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Metal Ion Signaling in Biomedicine.Chemical reviews · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Imaging plant metabolism in situ.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  10. Spatial pharmacology using mass spectrometry imaging.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Recent advances in mass spectrometry imaging of single cells.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frank GyngardCenter for NanoImaging, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Matthew L SteinhauserCenter for NanoImaging, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Funding

A new modality to image tumor metabolic heterogeneity at subcellular resolutionDP2CA216362 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STEINHAUSER, MATTHEW · 2016 to 2016
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS DP2 CA216362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigation of biological processes at the single cell or subcellular level is critical in order to better understand heterogenous cell populations. Nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS) enables multiplexed, quantitative imaging of the elemental composition of a sample surface at high resolution (< 50 nm). Through measurement of two different isotopic variants of any given element, NanoSIMS provides nanoscale isotope ratio measurements. When coupled with stable isotope tracer methods, the measurement of isotope ratios functionally illuminates biochemical pathways at suborganelle resolution. In this review, we describe the practical application of NanoSIMS to study biological processes in organisms ranging from microbes to humans, highlighting experimental applications that have provided insight that is largely unattainable by other methods.

Identifiers

PMID34054180
PMCPMC8158666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.