Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34054164›Full record

ArticleMotivation and emotion2021

Boredom proneness, political orientation and adherence to social-distancing in the pandemic.

Nicholaus P Brosowsky, Wijnand Van Tilburg, Abigail A Scholer, James Boylan, Paul Seli, James Danckert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Motivation and emotion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Creativity, Boredom Proneness and Well-Being in the Pandemic.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholaus P BrosowskyDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, 417 Chapel Drive, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
Wijnand Van TilburgDepartment of Psychology, Essex University, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, C04 3SQ UK.
Abigail A ScholerDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada.
James BoylanDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada.
Paul SeliDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, 417 Chapel Drive, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
James DanckertDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8093-066X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research recently showed that boredom proneness was associated with increased social distancing rule-breaking in a sample collected early in the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we explore data collected early in the pandemic to examine what factors might drive this relation. We focus on political affiliation. Given the functional account of boredom as a call to action, we hypothesized that this urge to act may drive individuals towards outlets replete with symbolic value (e.g., ideology, identity). In addition, given the politicization of some social distancing rules (e.g., mask wearing), we explored whether those who adhere to strong political ideologies-particularly conservative ideologies-would be more likely to rule-break. Moderation analyses indicated that boredom proneness and social (but not fiscal) conservatism were indeed predictive of rule-breaking. These results highlight the need for both clear messaging emphasizing the strength of communal identity and action (i.e., that "We are all in this together") and for interventions that emphasize shared collective values in contexts that appeal directly to social conservatives.

Indexed as

Boredom pronenessCOVID-19Political ideologyRule-breaking

Identifiers

PMID34054164
PMCPMC8143989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.