Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053919›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2021

Role of liver support systems in the management of post hepatectomy liver failure: A systematic review of the literature.

Kamil Pufal, Alexander Lawson, James Hodson, Mansoor Bangash, Jaimin Patel, Chris Weston, Thomas van Gulik, Bobby Vm Dasari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kamil PufalDepartment of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7596-3229
Alexander LawsonDepartment of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5846-1756
James HodsonInstitute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3487-0090
Mansoor BangashUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5039-5184
Jaimin PatelUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-3923
Chris WestonCentre for Liver & Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9651-1264
Thomas van GulikDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centres (Location Amsterdam Medical Centre), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3668-1381
Bobby Vm DasariDepartment of HPB and Liver Transplantation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2375-1141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/

aimsPost-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a serious complication following liver resection, with limited treatment options, and is associated with high mortality. There is a need to evaluate the role of systems that support the function of the liver after PHLF.

aimsThe aim of this study was to review the literature and summarize the role of liver support systems (LSS) in the management of PHLF. Publications of interest were identified using systematically designed searches. Following screening, data from the relevant publications was extracted, and pooled where possible.

findingsSystematic review identified nine studies, which used either Plasma Exchange (PE) or Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) as LSS after PHLF. Across all studies, the pooled 90-day mortality rate was 38% (95% CI: 9-70%). However, there was substantial heterogeneity, likely since studies used a variety of definitions for PHLF, and had different selection criteria for patient eligibility for LSS treatment.

conclusionsThe current evidence is insufficient to recommend LSS for the routine management of severe PHLF, with the current literature consisting of only a limited number of studies. There is a definite need for larger, multicenter, prospective studies, evaluating the conventional and newer modalities of support systems, with a view to improve the outcomes in this group of patients.

Indexed as

Liver resectionMARSPlasma exchange systemPost hepatectomy liver failure

Identifiers

PMID34053919
PMCPMC8180400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.