Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053742›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2023

Value of psychosocial evaluation for left ventricular assist device candidates.

Caroline K Olt, Lucy W Thuita, Edward G Soltesz, Michael Z Tong, Aaron J Weiss, Kay Kendall, Jerry D Estep, Eugene H Blackstone, Eileen M Hsich, Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant Research Group

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline K OltEmory University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Lucy W ThuitaDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio.
Edward G SolteszCleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Michael Z TongCleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Aaron J WeissCleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Kay KendallTransplant Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jerry D EstepCleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Eugene H BlackstoneDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; Transplant Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Eileen M HsichCleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: Hsiche@ccf.org.
Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant Research Group
University School · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USCase Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Impact of Disparities Affecting Survival among Advanced Heart Failure Patients and Transplant RecipientsR01HL141892 · NHLBI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI HSICH, EILEEN MICHELLE, ISHWARAN, HEMANT · 2018 to 2021
$2.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLeft ventricular assist devices require a psychosocial assessment to determine candidacy despite limited data correlating with outcome. Our objective is to determine whether the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant, a tool validated for transplant and widely used by left ventricular assist device programs, predicts left ventricular assist device program hospital readmissions and death.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of adults at the Cleveland Clinic with Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant scores before primary left ventricular assist device program implantation from April 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was unplanned hospital readmissions censored at death, transplantation, and transfer of care. The secondary outcome was death.

resultsThere were 263 patients in the left ventricular assist device program with a median (Q1, Q3) Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score of 16 (8, 28). During a median follow-up 1.2 years, 56 died, 65 underwent transplantation, and 21 had transferred care. There were 640 unplanned hospital readmissions among 250 patients with at least 1 outpatient visit at our center. In a multivariable analysis, Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components but not total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score was associated with readmissions. Psychopathology (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-IX) was associated with hemocompatibility (coefficient 0.21 ± standard error 0.11, P = .040) and cardiac (0.15 ± 0.065, P = .02) readmissions. Patient readiness was associated with noncardiac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-III, 0.24 ± 0.099, P = .016) and cardiac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-low total, 0.037 ± 0.014, P = .007) readmissions. Poor living environment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant B-VIII) was associated with device-related readmissions (0.83 ± 0.34, P = .014). Death was associated with organic psychopathology or neurocognitive impairment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-X, 0.59 ± 0.21, P = .006).

conclusionsTotal Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score was not associated with left ventricular assist device program readmission or mortality. However, we identified certain Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components that were associated with outcome and could be used to create a left ventricular assist device program specific psychosocial tool.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureHeart TransplantationAdultHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeheart transplantationhospital readmissionsmechanical circulatory supportoutcome assessmentSIPAT

Identifiers

PMID34053742
PMCPMC10443599
OpenAlexW3158927125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.