Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053462›Full record

ReviewActa veterinaria Scandinavica2021

Nervous system modulation through electrical stimulation in companion animals.

Ângela Martins, Débora Gouveia, Ana Cardoso, Óscar Gamboa, Darryl Millis, António Ferreira

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ângela MartinsAnimal Rehabilitation Center, Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Azeitão, Setúbal, Portugal. vetarrabida.lda@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2521-2582
Débora GouveiaAnimal Rehabilitation Center, Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Azeitão, Setúbal, Portugal.
Ana CardosoAnimal Rehabilitation Center, Arrábida Veterinary Hospital, Azeitão, Setúbal, Portugal.
Óscar GamboaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
Darryl MillisDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, TN, USA.
António FerreiraFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
University of Lisbon · PTHospital Garcia de Orta · PTUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domestic animals with severe spontaneous spinal cord injury (SCI), including dogs and cats that are deep pain perception negative (DPP-), can benefit from specific evaluations involving neurorehabilitation integrative protocols. In human medicine, patients without deep pain sensation, classified as grade A on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale, can recover after multidisciplinary approaches that include rehabilitation modalities, such as functional electrical stimulation (FES), transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (TESCS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). This review intends to explore the history, biophysics, neurophysiology, neuroanatomy and the parameters of FES, TESCS, and TDCS, as safe and noninvasive rehabilitation modalities applied in the veterinary field. Additional studies need to be conducted in clinical settings to successfully implement these guidelines in dogs and cats.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDog DiseasesSpinal Cord InjuriesTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAnimalsCatsDogsElectric StimulationHumansPetsSpinal CordCatDogElectrostimulationFunctionalityNeurorehabilitation modalitiesSpinal cord

Identifiers

PMID34053462
PMCPMC8167506
OpenAlexW3164758019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.