Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053451›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2021

Evaluating human-centred design for public health: a case study on developing a healthcare app with refugee communities.

Rebeccah Bartlett, Jacqueline A Boyle, Jessica Simons Smith, Nadia Khan, Tracy Robinson, Rohit Ramaswamy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebeccah BartlettMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation - MCHRI, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. rebeccah.bartlett@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7047-1295
Jacqueline A BoyleMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation - MCHRI, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jessica Simons SmithPublic Health Leadership Program, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Nadia KhanMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation - MCHRI, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Tracy RobinsonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Indigenous Health, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, Australia.
Rohit RamaswamyPublic Health Leadership Program, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Monash Health · AUUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCharles Sturt University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAustralian women from migrant and refugee communities experience reduced access to sexual and reproductive healthcare. Human-centred design can be a more ethical and effective approach to developing health solutions with underserved populations that are more likely to experience significant disadvantage or social marginalisation. This study aimed to evaluate how well Shifra, a small Australian-based not-for-profit, applied human-centred design when developing a web-based application that delivers local, evidence-based and culturally relevant health information to its non-English speaking users.

methodsThis study undertook a document review, survey, and semi-structured interviews to evaluate how well Shifra was able to achieve its objectives using a human-centred design approach.

resultsA co-design process successfully led to the development of a web-based health app for refugee and migrant women. This evaluation also yielded several important recommendations for improving Shifra's human-centred design approach moving forward.

conclusionsImproving refugees' access to sexual and reproductive health is complex and requires innovative and thoughtful problem solving. This evaluation of Shifra's human-centred design approach provides a helpful and rigorous guide in reporting that may encourage other organisations undertaking human-centred design work to evaluate their own implementation.

Indexed as

Design thinkingEvaluationHuman-centred designRefugee health

Identifiers

PMID34053451
PMCPMC8166144
OpenAlexW3135803151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.