Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053446›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

A data-driven metapopulation model for the Belgian COVID-19 epidemic: assessing the impact of lockdown and exit strategies.

Pietro Coletti, Pieter Libin, Oana Petrof, Lander Willem, Steven Abrams, Sereina A Herzog, Christel Faes, Elise Kuylen, James Wambua, Philippe Beutels and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemicThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pietro ColettiData Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium. pietro.coletti@uhasselt.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9935-1692
Pieter LibinData Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium.
Oana PetrofData Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium.
Lander WillemCentre for Health Economics Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.
Steven AbramsData Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium.
Sereina A HerzogCentre for Health Economics Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.
Christel FaesData Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium.
Elise KuylenData Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium.
James WambuaData Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium.
Philippe BeutelsCentre for Health Economics Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.
Niel HensData Science Institute, I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Gebouw D, Diepenbeek, 3590, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEHasselt University · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen 1234620NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1242021NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G0G2920NH2020 European Research Council 682540H2020 Science with and for Society 101003688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, several countries adopted measures of social distancing to a different degree. For many countries, after successfully curbing the initial wave, lockdown measures were gradually lifted. In Belgium, such relief started on May 4th with phase 1, followed by several subsequent phases over the next few weeks.

methodsWe analysed the expected impact of relaxing stringent lockdown measures taken according to the phased Belgian exit strategy. We developed a stochastic, data-informed, meta-population model that accounts for mixing and mobility of the age-structured population of Belgium. The model is calibrated to daily hospitalization data and is able to reproduce the outbreak at the national level. We consider different scenarios for relieving the lockdown, quantified in terms of relative reductions in pre-pandemic social mixing and mobility. We validate our assumptions by making comparisons with social contact data collected during and after the lockdown.

resultsOur model is able to successfully describe the initial wave of COVID-19 in Belgium and identifies interactions during leisure/other activities as pivotal in the exit strategy. Indeed, we find a smaller impact of school re-openings as compared to restarting leisure activities and re-openings of work places. We also assess the impact of case isolation of new (suspected) infections, and find that it allows re-establishing relatively more social interactions while still ensuring epidemic control. Scenarios predicting a second wave of hospitalizations were not observed, suggesting that the per-contact probability of infection has changed with respect to the pre-lockdown period.

conclusionsContacts during leisure activities are found to be most influential, followed by professional contacts and school contacts, respectively, for an impending second wave of COVID-19. Regular re-assessment of social contacts in the population is therefore crucial to adjust to evolving behavioral changes that can affect epidemic diffusion.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalPandemicsBelgiumCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19HospitalizationHumansPhysical DistancingSchoolsWorkplaceBehavioral changesCOVID-19Epidemic modelingMetapopulationMixing patternsSpatial transmission

Identifiers

PMID34053446
PMCPMC8164894
OpenAlexW3164814417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.