Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053259›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021

The impact of school reopening on the spread of COVID-19 in England.

Matt J Keeling, Michael J Tildesley, Benjamin D Atkins, Bridget Penman, Emma Southall, Glen Guyver-Fletcher, Alex Holmes, Hector McKimm, Erin E Gorsich, Edward M Hill and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemicThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Simulating respiratory disease transmission within and between classrooms to assess pandemic management strategies at schools.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Matt J KeelingThe Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics InstituteUniversity of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Michael J TildesleyThe Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics InstituteUniversity of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Benjamin D AtkinsThe Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics InstituteUniversity of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Bridget PenmanThe Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics InstituteUniversity of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Emma SouthallThe Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics InstituteUniversity of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Glen Guyver-FletcherThe Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics InstituteUniversity of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Alex HolmesThe Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics InstituteUniversity of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Hector McKimmThe Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics InstituteUniversity of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Erin E GorsichThe Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics InstituteUniversity of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Edward M HillThe Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics InstituteUniversity of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Louise DysonThe Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics InstituteUniversity of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V009761/1Medical Research Council MR/V038613/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By mid-May 2020, cases of COVID-19 in the UK had been declining for over a month; a multi-phase emergence from lockdown was planned, including a scheduled partial reopening of schools on 1 June 2020. Although evidence suggests that children generally display mild symptoms, the size of the school-age population means the total impact of reopening schools is unclear. Here, we present work from mid-May 2020 that focused on the imminent opening of schools and consider what these results imply for future policy. We compared eight strategies for reopening primary and secondary schools in England. Modifying a transmission model fitted to UK SARS-CoV-2 data, we assessed how reopening schools affects contact patterns, anticipated secondary infections and the relative change in the reproduction number,

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlModels, TheoreticalPandemicsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19EnglandFemaleHumansMalePhysical DistancingSARS-CoV-2SchoolsYoung AdultCOVID-19deterministic modelmathematical modellingreopening schoolsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34053259
PMCPMC8165595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.