Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053250›Full record

Trial reportClinical rehabilitation2021

Dual-task walking and automaticity after Stroke: Insights from a secondary analysis and imaging sub-study of a randomised controlled trial.

Johnny Collett, Melanie K Fleming, Daan Meester, Emad Al-Yahya, Derick T Wade, Andrea Dennis, Piergiorgio Salvan, Andrew Meaney, Janet Cockburn, Joanna Dawes and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Applications of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Neuroimaging During Rehabilitation Following Stroke: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Risks of Accidents Caused by the Use of Smartphone by Pedestrians Are Task- and Environment-Dependent.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Johnny CollettCentre for Movement, Occupational and Rehabilitation Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4138-2589
Melanie K FlemingWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Daan MeesterCentre for Movement, Occupational and Rehabilitation Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Emad Al-YahyaCentre for Movement, Occupational and Rehabilitation Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Derick T WadeCentre for Movement, Occupational and Rehabilitation Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1188-8442
Andrea DennisWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Piergiorgio SalvanWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Andrew MeaneyCentre for Movement, Occupational and Rehabilitation Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Janet CockburnRetired.
Joanna DawesDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Brunel University, London, UK.
Heidi Johansen-BergWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Helen DawesCentre for Movement, Occupational and Rehabilitation Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Brookes University · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBBrunel University of London · GBUniversity of Jordan · JO

Funding

Wellcome Trust 110027Wellcome Trust 203139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the extent to which initial walking speed influences dual-task performance after walking intervention, hypothesising that slow walking speed affects automatic gait control, limiting executive resource availability.

designA secondary analysis of a trial of dual-task (DT) and single-task (ST) walking interventions comparing those with

settingCommunity. SUBJECTS: Adults six-months post stroke with walking impairment.

interventionsTwenty sessions of 30 minutes treadmill walking over 10 weeks with (DT) or without (ST) cognitive distraction. MAIN MEASURES: A two-minute walk with (DT) and without (ST) a cognitive distraction assessed walking.

resultsST walking improved in both groups (∆baseline:

conclusionIn individual who walk slowly it may be difficult to improve dual-task walking ability.

Indexed as

StrokeWalkingAdultExercise TestGaitHumansWalking Speeddual-task interferencefunctional MRIgaitrehabilitationStroke

Identifiers

PMID34053250
PMCPMC8524683
OpenAlexW3164731897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.