Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053233›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2021

Abdominal paracentesis drainage attenuates intestinal mucosal barrier damage through macrophage polarization in severe acute pancreatitis.

Xiaohui Yuan, Chen Luo, Jun Wu, Wei Li, Xin Guo, Shuai Li, Bing Wang, Hongyu Sun, Lijun Tang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ascites Volume Quantification via Abdominal CT: A Novel Approach to Predict Severity in Acute Pancreatitis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaohui YuanCollege of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Chen LuoDepartment of General Surgery & Pancreatic Injury and Repair Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu 610083, China.
Jun WuCollege of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Wei LiLaboratory of Basic Medical Sciences, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu 610083, China.
Xin GuoLaboratory of Basic Medical Sciences, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu 610083, China.
Shuai LiCollege of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Bing WangCollege of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Hongyu SunCollege of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Lijun TangCollege of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6000-9515
Southwest Jiaotong University · CNPanzhihua Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal paracentesis drainage (APD), as an effective treatment of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) in clinical settings, can ameliorate intestinal barrier damage and the overall severity of SAP. However, the mechanism underlying therapeutic effects of APD on damaged intestinal mucosal barrier during SAP is still unclear. Here, SAP was induced by injecting 5% Na-taurocholate retrograde into the biliopancreatic duct of rats to confirm the benefits of APD on enteral injury of SAP and further explore the possible mechanism. Abdominal catheter was placed after SAP was induced in APD group. As control group, the sham group received no operation except abdominal opening and closure. By comparing changes among control group, sham group, and APD group, APD treatment obviously lowered the intestinal damage and reduced the permeation of intestinal mucosal barrier, which was evidenced by intestinal H&E staining, enteral expression of tight junction proteins, intestinal apoptosis measurement and detection of serum diamine oxidase, intestinal fatty acid binding protein and D-lactic acid. Furthermore, we found that APD polarized intestinal macrophages toward M2 phenotype by the determination of immunofluorescence and western blotting, and this accounts for the benefits of APD for intestinal injury in SAP. Importantly, the protective effect against intestinal injury by APD treatment was mediated through the inhibited ASK1/JNK pathway. In summary, APD improved the intestinal mucosal barrier damage in rats with SAP through an increasing portion of M2 phenotype macrophages in intestine via inhibiting ASK1/JNK pathway.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalIntestinal DiseasesMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesMalePancreatitisParacentesisRatsRats, Sprague-Dawleyabdominal paracentesis drainageapoptosisASK1/JNK pathwayintestinal mucosal barriermacrophage polarizationSevere acute pancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID34053233
PMCPMC8474980
OpenAlexW3205896378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.