Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053115›Full record

SynthesisActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2021

Systematic review shows the benefits of involving the fathers of preterm infants in early interventions in neonatal intensive care units.

Manuela Filippa, Sahar Saliba, Rana Esseily, Maya Gratier, Didier Grandjean, Pierre Kuhn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Pretesting Parenting Instruments with Indigenous Fathers and Two-Spirit Parents: A Qualitative Study.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Understanding and addressing mental health challenges of families admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manuela FilippaNeuroscience of Emotion and Affective Dynamics Lab, Swiss Center for Affective Sciences and Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1310-8008
Sahar SalibaDepartment of Psychomotor Therapy, Faculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2659-7955
Rana EsseilyEthology, Cognition and Development Laboratory, UPL, University of Paris Nanterre, Nanterre, France.
Maya GratierEthology, Cognition and Development Laboratory, UPL, University of Paris Nanterre, Nanterre, France.
Didier GrandjeanNeuroscience of Emotion and Affective Dynamics Lab, Swiss Center for Affective Sciences and Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pierre KuhnDepartment of Neonatal Medicine, Hautepierre Hospital University Hospital, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3132-481X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis review identifies interventions involving the fathers of preterm infants that have been tested in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). It examines their effects on the fathers and infants and highlights any differences between fathers and mothers who took part in the same interventions.

methodsA systematic search was performed in English from 1995 to 1 September 2020, using the CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed and PsycINFO databases. We examined 14 peer-reviewed studies that investigated NICU interventions involving 478 fathers, whose 511 infants were born before 37 weeks of gestation. These included empirical studies with clinical outcomes.

resultsStudies on fathers' interventions in NICUs were limited and mainly restricted to basic skin-to-skin contact or tactile interventions. The interventions had similar general positive effects on mothers and fathers when it came to infant physiological and behavioural reactions. There was also evidence of a positive effect on the fathers, including their mental health.

conclusionIncluding fathers as active partners in the care of their preterm newborn infants produced good outcomes for both of them. Further research is needed to develop new, multimodal and interactive interventions that provide fathers with positive contact with their preterm infants.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalEarly Intervention, EducationalFathersHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleearly interventionfatherneonatal intensive care unitpreterm infantssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34053115
PMCPMC8453504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.