Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053056›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Methods to Study Posttranslational Modification Patterns in Cytotoxic T-Cells and Cancer.

Annamaria Deleonardis, Massimo Papale

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Annamaria DeleonardisR&D Unit, Fluidia srl, Foggia, Italy.
Massimo PapaleClinical Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Policlinic University Hospital "Riuniti", Foggia, Italy. massimo.papale@unifg.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein posttranslational modifications (PTMs) regulate intracellular signaling associated with development and progression of many diseases; thus, they are key to understanding pathological mechanisms and set up more tailored therapies. In addition, many posttranslationally modified proteins are released into biological fluids and can be used as new and more specific biomarkers. Based on this evidence, we analyzed the role of some PTMs in cancer and described the correlation between specific PTMs and T-cells activation/inhibition in cancer microenvironment. In the second part of this chapter, we analyzed the most commonly used approaches for qualitative and quantitative determination of PTMs. The comparison of three distinct but often complementary methodologies such as immunoblotting, mass spectrometry, and ELISA assays has allowed to highlight the pros and cons of each approach with a focus on their current application and their future developments to obtain more confident biomarkers and therapeutic targets useful for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of the response to therapy.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansImmunoblottingLymphocyte ActivationMass SpectrometryNeoplasmsProteomicsT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersCancerELISAImmunoblottingMass SpectrometryPhospho-ELISAPosttranslational ModificationsPTMsT-Cells

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.