Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053040›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

The 'vicious cycle' of energy poverty and productivity: insights from 45 developing countries.

Canh Phuc Nguyen, Thanh Dinh Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Canh Phuc NguyenSchool of Public Finance, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, 59C Nguyen Dinh Chieu, District 3, Ho Chi Minh, 700000, Vietnam. canhnguyen@ueh.edu.vn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8467-5010
Thanh Dinh SuSchool of Public Finance, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, 59C Nguyen Dinh Chieu, District 3, Ho Chi Minh, 700000, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is the first proper attempt to examine the influence of energy poverty on productivity. Specifically, the study investigates the effects on the level and convergence of total factor productivity of no access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking; no access to electricity in the total population; no access to electricity in the rural population; no access to electricity in the urban population; non-renewable electricity production; and non-renewable electricity consumption. The study examines a global sample of 45 developing countries from 2002 to 2017 and offers three empirical analysis findings. First, the mutual causalities between the five dimensions of energy poverty and total factor productivity are shown by a non-Granger causality test for panel data, except one-direction causality from no access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking to total factor productivity convergence, which hints a 'vicious cycle' of two variables. Second, the two-step system generalised method of moments estimates show significant negative impacts of no access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking and the three variables of no access to electricity on total factor productivity. In contrast, the production and consumption of non-renewable electricity appear to have significant positive effects. Third, the three-stage least squares estimates provide statistical evidence that the effects of energy poverty on total factor productivity are transmitted through human capital accumulation, Internet usage, and the shadow economy.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesPovertyCarbon DioxideCookingEconomic DevelopmentElectricityHumansRenewable EnergyRural PopulationCarbon DioxideDeveloping countriesEnergy povertyHuman capitalInternet usageProductivityTotal factor productivity

Identifiers

PMID34053040
PMCPMC8164495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.