Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053035›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Fungal biodegradation and removal of cyanobacteria and microcystins: potential applications and research needs.

Zakaria A Mohamed, Mohamed Hashem, Saad Alamri, Alexandre Campos, Vitor Vasconcelos

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Fast Capture and Efficient Removal of Bloom Algae Based on Improved Dielectrophoresis Process.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Microcystins in Water: Detection, Microbial Degradation Strategies, and Mechanisms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Zakaria A MohamedDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, Sohag, 82524, Egypt. mzakaria_99@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6378-1914
Mohamed HashemCollege of Science, Department of Biology, King Khalid University, Abha, 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Saad AlamriCollege of Science, Department of Biology, King Khalid University, Abha, 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Alexandre CamposCIIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, Terminal de Cruzeiros Do Porto de Leixões, Av. General Norton de Matos, s/n, 4450-208, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Vitor VasconcelosCIIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, Terminal de Cruzeiros Do Porto de Leixões, Av. General Norton de Matos, s/n, 4450-208, Matosinhos, Portugal.
King Khalid University · SAUniversidade do Porto · PTSohag University · EG

Funding

the Deanship of Scientific Research- King Khalid University, R.G.P. 2/11/42the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 823860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harmful cyanobacterial blooms (HCB) have severe impacts on marine and freshwater systems worldwide. They cause oxygen depletion and produce potent cyanotoxins that have detrimental effects on human and environmental health and deteriorate the water quality. Biological treatment of the water for control of cyanobacterial blooms and removal of cyanotoxins can be a more economical and environment-friendly way, as they do not result in production of undesirable by-products. Most biological treatments of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins have concentrated largely on bacteria, with little attention paid to algicidal fungi. Therefore, this review aims to provide an overview of the current status and the main progresses achieved in fungal biodegradation of HCB and cyanotoxin research. The available data revealed that 15 fungal species had high lytic activity against cyanobacteria, and 6 species were capable of degrading microcystins (MCs). Some fungal species (e.g., Aurobasidium pullulans and Trichoderma citrinoviride) have been identified to selectively inhibit the growth of cyanobacteria rather than beneficial species of other algal groups. Interestingly, some fungal strains (Trichaptum abietinum, Trichoderma citrinoviride) exhibited di-functional trait, being efficient in lysing cyanobacteria and degrading MCs released from the cells after decay. Beyond a comprehensive review of algicidal and toxin-degrading activities of fungi, this paper also identifies and prioritizes research gaps in algicidal fungi. The review also gives insights to the potential applications of algicidal fungi for removal of cyanobacterial blooms and their cyanotoxins from the aquatic environment.

Indexed as

CyanobacteriaMicrocystinsBasidiomycotaFungiHarmful Algal BloomHumansHypocrealesMicrocystinsAlgicidesBiocontrolCyanobacteriaFungiHarmful algal blooms

Identifiers

PMID34053035
OpenAlexW3164933118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.