Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053010›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

Applying machine learning to optical coherence tomography images for automated tissue classification in brain metastases.

Jens Möller, Alexander Bartsch, Marcel Lenz, Iris Tischoff, Robin Krug, Hubert Welp, Martin R Hofmann, Kirsten Schmieder, Dorothea Miller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The neurosurgical benefit of contactlessFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jens Möller *Photonics and Terahertz Technology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. jens.moeller@ruhr-uni-bochum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7224-3114
Alexander Bartsch *Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Marcel LenzPhotonics and Terahertz Technology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Iris TischoffDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Robin KrugDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Hubert WelpTechnische Hochschule Georg Agricola, Bochum, Germany.
Martin R HofmannPhotonics and Terahertz Technology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Kirsten SchmiederDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Dorothea MillerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum · DERuhr University Bochum · DEBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DETechnische Hochschule Georg Agricola · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA precise resection of the entire tumor tissue during surgery for brain metastases is essential to reduce local recurrence. Conventional intraoperative imaging techniques all have limitations in detecting tumor remnants. Therefore, there is a need for innovative new imaging methods such as optical coherence tomography (OCT). The purpose of this study is to discriminate brain metastases from healthy brain tissue in an ex vivo setting by applying texture analysis and machine learning algorithms for tissue classification to OCT images.

methodsTumor and healthy tissue samples were collected during resection of brain metastases. Samples were imaged using OCT. Texture features were extracted from B-scans. Then, a machine learning algorithm using principal component analysis (PCA) and support vector machines (SVM) was applied to the OCT scans for classification. As a gold standard, an experienced pathologist examined the tissue samples histologically and determined the percentage of vital tumor, necrosis and healthy tissue of each sample. A total of 14.336 B-scans from 14 tissue samples were included in the classification analysis.

resultsWe were able to discriminate vital tumor from healthy brain tissue with an accuracy of 95.75%. By comparing necrotic tissue and healthy tissue, a classification accuracy of 99.10% was obtained. A generalized classification between brain metastases (vital tumor and necrosis) and healthy tissue was achieved with an accuracy of 96.83%.

conclusionsAn automated classification of brain metastases and healthy brain tissue is feasible using OCT imaging, extracted texture features and machine learning with PCA and SVM. The established approach can prospectively provide the surgeon with additional information about the tissue, thus optimizing the extent of tumor resection and minimizing the risk of local recurrences.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsTomography, Optical CoherenceAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningSupport Vector MachineAutomated tissue differentiationComputational diagnosticsHistopathologyMachine learningMetastasesOptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID34053010
PMCPMC8354973
OpenAlexW3163967140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.