ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021
Applying machine learning to optical coherence tomography images for automated tissue classification in brain metastases.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiating malignancy from liver parenchyma in Ex-Vivo OCT images using anomaly detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Autonomous Surgical Guidance Using 3-Dimensional Images From Forward-Viewing Endoscopic Optical Coherence Tomography.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- Review
- Label-free optical imaging for brain cancer assessment.Trends in cancer · 2024Review
- Quantification of attenuation and speckle features from endoscopic OCT images for the diagnosis of human brain glioma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Optical Methods for Brain Tumor Detection: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Optical coherence tomography combined with convolutional neural networks can differentiate between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver parenchyma ex vivo.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Optical coherence tomography and convolutional neural networks can differentiate colorectal liver metastases from liver parenchyma ex vivo.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Real-time closed-loop tissue-specific laser osteotomy using deep-learning-assisted optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- The neurosurgical benefit of contactlessFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Nondestructive label-free detection of peritumoral white matter damage using cross-polarization optical coherence tomography.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Deep learning-based optical coherence tomography image analysis of human brain cancer.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Binary dose level classification of tumour microvascular response to radiotherapy using artificial intelligence analysis of optical coherence tomography images.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Intraoperative tissue classification methods in orthopedic and neurological surgeries: A systematic review.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Differentiation of different stages of brain tumor infiltration using optical coherence tomography: Comparison of two systems and histology.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA precise resection of the entire tumor tissue during surgery for brain metastases is essential to reduce local recurrence. Conventional intraoperative imaging techniques all have limitations in detecting tumor remnants. Therefore, there is a need for innovative new imaging methods such as optical coherence tomography (OCT). The purpose of this study is to discriminate brain metastases from healthy brain tissue in an ex vivo setting by applying texture analysis and machine learning algorithms for tissue classification to OCT images.
methodsTumor and healthy tissue samples were collected during resection of brain metastases. Samples were imaged using OCT. Texture features were extracted from B-scans. Then, a machine learning algorithm using principal component analysis (PCA) and support vector machines (SVM) was applied to the OCT scans for classification. As a gold standard, an experienced pathologist examined the tissue samples histologically and determined the percentage of vital tumor, necrosis and healthy tissue of each sample. A total of 14.336 B-scans from 14 tissue samples were included in the classification analysis.
resultsWe were able to discriminate vital tumor from healthy brain tissue with an accuracy of 95.75%. By comparing necrotic tissue and healthy tissue, a classification accuracy of 99.10% was obtained. A generalized classification between brain metastases (vital tumor and necrosis) and healthy tissue was achieved with an accuracy of 96.83%.
conclusionsAn automated classification of brain metastases and healthy brain tissue is feasible using OCT imaging, extracted texture features and machine learning with PCA and SVM. The established approach can prospectively provide the surgeon with additional information about the tissue, thus optimizing the extent of tumor resection and minimizing the risk of local recurrences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.