Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34053009›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

LiverNet: efficient and robust deep learning model for automatic diagnosis of sub-types of liver hepatocellular carcinoma cancer from H&E stained liver histopathology images.

Anirudh Ashok Aatresh, Kumar Alabhya, Shyam Lal, Jyoti Kini, P U Prakash Saxena

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anirudh Ashok AatreshDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Mangaluru, Karnataka, 575025, India.
Kumar AlabhyaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Mangaluru, Karnataka, 575025, India.
Shyam LalDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute Technology Karnataka, Surathkal, Mangaluru, Karnataka, 575025, India. shyam.mtec@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4355-6354
Jyoti KiniDepartment of pathology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. kinijyoti@gmail.com.
P U Prakash SaxenaDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

This research work was supported in part by the Science Engineering and Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India Grant No.ECR/2017/000689,2017.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLiver cancer is one of the most common types of cancers in Asia with a high mortality rate. A common method for liver cancer diagnosis is the manual examination of histopathology images. Due to its laborious nature, we focus on alternate deep learning methods for automatic diagnosis, providing significant advantages over manual methods. In this paper, we propose a novel deep learning framework to perform multi-class cancer classification of liver hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor histopathology images which shows improvements in inference speed and classification quality over other competitive methods.

methodThe BreastNet architecture proposed by Togacar et al. shows great promise in using convolutional block attention modules (CBAM) for effective cancer classification in H&E stained breast histopathology images. As part of our experiments with this framework, we have studied the addition of atrous spatial pyramid pooling (ASPP) blocks to effectively capture multi-scale features in H&E stained liver histopathology data. We classify liver histopathology data into four classes, namely the non-cancerous class, low sub-type liver HCC tumor, medium sub-type liver HCC tumor, and high sub-type liver HCC tumor. To prove the robustness and efficacy of our models, we have shown results for two liver histopathology datasets-a novel KMC dataset and the TCGA dataset.

resultsOur proposed architecture outperforms state-of-the-art architectures for multi-class cancer classification of HCC histopathology images, not just in terms of quality of classification, but also in computational efficiency on the novel proposed KMC liver data and the publicly available TCGA-LIHC dataset. We have considered precision, recall, F1-score, intersection over union (IoU), accuracy, number of parameters, and FLOPs as metrics for comparison. The results of our meticulous experiments have shown improved classification performance along with added efficiency. LiverNet has been observed to outperform all other frameworks in all metrics under comparison with an approximate improvement of [Formula: see text] in accuracy and F1-score on the KMC and TCGA-LIHC datasets.

conclusionTo the best of our knowledge, our work is among the first to provide concrete proof and demonstrate results for a successful deep learning architecture to handle multi-class HCC histopathology image classification among various sub-types of liver HCC tumor. Our method shows a high accuracy of [Formula: see text] on the proposed KMC liver dataset requiring only 0.5739 million parameters and 1.1934 million floating point operations per second.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularDeep LearningLiver NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedConvolutional neural networkDeep learningHCC histopathology imagesLiver cancer gradingMedical image classification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.