Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34052955›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

Copy number variation sequencing combined with quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction in clinical application of pregnancy loss.

Lin Chen, Li Wang, Feng Tang, Yang Zeng, Daishu Yin, Cong Zhou, Hongmei Zhu, Linping Li, Lili Zhang, Jing Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lin ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Block 3 No. 20, Ren Min Nan Road, Wuhou district, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9547-0261
Li WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Block 3 No. 20, Ren Min Nan Road, Wuhou district, Chengdu, China.
Feng TangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Block 3 No. 20, Ren Min Nan Road, Wuhou district, Chengdu, China.
Yang ZengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Block 3 No. 20, Ren Min Nan Road, Wuhou district, Chengdu, China.
Daishu YinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Block 3 No. 20, Ren Min Nan Road, Wuhou district, Chengdu, China.
Cong ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Block 3 No. 20, Ren Min Nan Road, Wuhou district, Chengdu, China.
Hongmei ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Block 3 No. 20, Ren Min Nan Road, Wuhou district, Chengdu, China.
Linping LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Block 3 No. 20, Ren Min Nan Road, Wuhou district, Chengdu, China.
Lili ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Block 3 No. 20, Ren Min Nan Road, Wuhou district, Chengdu, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Block 3 No. 20, Ren Min Nan Road, Wuhou district, Chengdu, China. hhwj_123@163.com.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province No.2020YFS0095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we evaluated the feasibility of the combining CNV-seq and quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) for miscarriage analysis in clinical practice.

methodsOver a 35-month period, a total of 389 fetal specimens including 356 chorionic villi and 33 fetal muscle tissues were analyzed by CNV-seq and QF-PCR. Relationships between the risk factors (e.g., advanced maternal age, abnormal pregnancy history, and gestational age) and incidence of these chromosomal abnormalities were further analyzed by subgroup.

resultsClinically significant chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 58.95% cases. Aneuploidy was the most common abnormality (46.84%), followed by polyploidy (8.16%) and structural chromosome anomalies (3.95%). In sub-group analysis, significant differences were found in the total frequency of chromosomal abnormalities between the early abortion and the late abortion group, as well as in the distribution of chromosomal abnormalities between the advanced and the younger maternal age group. Meanwhile, the results of the logistic regression analysis identified a trend suggesting that the percentage of fetal chromosomal abnormalities is significantly higher in advanced maternal age, lesser gestational age, and lesser number of prior miscarriages.

conclusionOur study suggests that CNV-seq and QF-PCR are efficient and reliable technologies in the fetal chromosome analysis of miscarriages and could be used as a routine selection method for the genetic analysis of spontaneous abortion.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsDNA Copy Number VariationsFluorescenceMaternal AgeAbortion, SpontaneousAdultChinaChorionic VilliFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedMusclesPolymerase Chain ReactionPregnancyYoung AdultChromosome aberrationsCNV-seqCopy number variationPregnancy lossQF-PCR

Identifiers

PMID34052955
PMCPMC8490602
OpenAlexW3165428083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.