ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2022
Salvage procedure for cut-through after surgical fixation of trochanteric fractures with TFN.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrapelvic Neck Screw Migration after Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advanced Fixation of a Trochanteric Femoral Fracture: A Case Report and Proposed Treatment Algorithm.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Conversion hip arthroplasty for failed nailing of intertrochanteric fracture: Reflections on some important aspects.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- Total hip arthroplasty following the failure of intertrochanteric nailing: First implant or salvage surgery?World journal of orthopedics · 2023Article
- Outcomes After Revision Fixation With Cement Augmentation for Failed Intertrochanteric Fracture Fixation in Older Adult Patients.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClosed reduction and fixation using a cephalomedullary nail represents the accepted management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Cut-through has been described as a complication associated with the treatment. Although a hip arthroplasty may be the most predictable revision method, a non-prosthetic option can lead to similar results. The objective is to describe a non-prosthetic revision procedure in cases of cut-through.
methodWe performed a retrospective analysis of our Institutional Registry for Hip Fractures in elderly patients (RIAFC) from January 2010 to June 2018 searching for cut-through as a failure after unstable intertrochanteric fracture treatment. REVISION PROCEDURE: (A) Helical blade removal, introduction of structural bone graft (autologous or allograft) as a plug to obliterate the communication to the joint and a new blade insertion. (B) Same as in A but augmenting the blade/head purchase with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Before the cement insertion, a radio-opaque solution was instilled to assure lack of joint leakage.
resultsWe evaluated 1616 patients. Sixteen of them presented a cut-through complication (1%). Ten of them were females with an average age for all of 84 years. One patient denied an implant revision and opted for a total joint replacement. In four of the patients, the procedure A was done, 2 of them had a new failure, and an joint arthroplasty was performed. In the B group, only one patient needed a revision to a total hip. The other 10 patients healed uneventfully and did not need any further intervention.
conclusionCut-through revision after fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nail by blocking of the joint communication and augmenting the head blade purchase with PMMA is a safe and minimal invasive procedure, generates low blood loss and rate of complications and allows bone healing preserving the native joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Nil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34052921What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.