Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34052881›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2021

Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).

Carlos Canelo-Aybar, Alvaro Taype-Rondan, Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka, David Rigau, Axel Graewingholt, Annette Lebeau, Elsa Pérez Gómez, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Miranda Langendam, Margarita Posso and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Escalating de-escalation in breast cancer treatment.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022
    Article
  6. Application of deep learning to identify ductal carcinomaQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Overcoming Barriers in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Management: From Overtreatment to Optimal Treatment.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Carlos Canelo-AybarCIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain. ccanelo@santpau.cat.
Alvaro Taype-RondanUniversidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Lima, Peru.
Jessica Hanae Zafra-TanakaCRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
David RigauIberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Axel GraewingholtRadiologie am Theater, Paderborn, Germany.
Annette LebeauInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Elsa Pérez GómezUniversity Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
Paolo Giorgi RossiEpidemiology Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Miranda LangendamDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Margarita PossoIberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antonio María Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Elena ParmelliEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi, 2749. TP127, I-21027, Ispra, VA, Italy. Elena.Parmelli@ec.europa.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3730-8530
Zuleika Saz-ParkinsonEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi, 2749. TP127, I-21027, Ispra, VA, Italy.
Pablo Alonso-CoelloCIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre · ESAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITEuropean Commission · BEHospital Del Mar · ESHospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta · ESJoint Research Centre · ITUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEUniversidad San Ignacio de Loyola · PEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of preoperative MRI in the management of Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

methodsWe searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) or cohort studies assessing the impact of preoperative breast MRI in surgical outcomes, treatment change or loco-regional recurrence. We provided pooled estimates for odds ratios (OR), relative risks (RR) and proportions and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

resultsWe included 3 RCTs and 23 observational cohorts, corresponding to 20,415 patients. For initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS), the RCTs showed that MRI may result in little to no difference (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.00) (low certainty); observational studies showed that MRI may have no difference in the odds of re-operation after BCS (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.36 to 2.61) (low certainty); and uncertain evidence from RCTs suggests little to no difference with respect to total mastectomy rate (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.27) (very low certainty). We also found that MRI may change the initial treatment plans in 17% (95% CI 12 to 24%) of cases, but with little to no effect on locoregional recurrence (aHR = 1.18; 95% CI 0.79 to 1.76) (very low certainty).

conclusionWe found evidence of low to very low certainty which may suggest there is no improvement of surgical outcomes with pre-operative MRI assessment of women with DCIS lesions. There is a need for large rigorously conducted RCTs to evaluate the role of preoperative MRI in this population. KEY POINTS: • Evidence of low to very low certainty may suggest there is no improvement in surgical outcomes with pre-operative MRI. • There is a need for large rigorously conducted RCTs evaluating the role of preoperative MRI to improve treatment planning for DCIS.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBreast cancerDuctal carcinoma in situMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID34052881
PMCPMC8270803
OpenAlexW3165720414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.