Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34052693›Full record

ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2021

Mechanics of cadaveric anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions during simulated jump landing tasks: Lessons learned from a pilot investigation.

Nathan D Schilaty, R Kyle Martin, Ryo Ueno, Luca Rigamonti, Nathaniel A Bates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathan D SchilatyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Sports Medicine Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
R Kyle MartinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, CentraCare, Saint Cloud, MN, USA.
Ryo UenoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Luca RigamontiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Nathaniel A BatesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Sports Medicine Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: batesna@gmail.com.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Interdisciplinary Women's Health Research ProgramK12HD065987 · NICHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KANTARCI, KEJAL · 2010 to 2023
$6.7M
Neuromuscular Intervention Targeted to Mechanisms of ACL Load in Female AthletesR01AR055563 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BATES, NATHANIEL ANDREW, KRYCH, AARON · 2008 to 2022
$5.9M
Multi-faceted Approach to Modeling ACL Injury MechanismsR01AR056259 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HEWETT, TIMOTHY E · 2009 to 2017
$4.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS L30 AR070273NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055563NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056259NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD065987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAround half of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are treated through reconstruction, but the literature lacks mechanical investigation of reconstructions in a dynamic athletic task and rupture environment. The current objective was to ascertain the feasibility of investigating ACL reconstructions in a rupture environment during simulated landing tasks in a validated mechanical impact simulator.

methodsFour cadaveric lower extremities were subjected to simulated landing in a mechanical impact simulator. External joint loads that mimicked magnitudes recorded from an in vivo population were applied to each joint in a stepwise manner. Simulations were repeated until ACL failure was achieved. Repeated measures design was used to test each specimen in the native ACL and hamstrings, quadriceps, and patellar tendon reconstructed states.

findingsACL injuries were generated in 100% of specimens. Graft substance damage occurred in 58% of ACLRs, and in 75% of bone tendon bone grafts. Bone tendon bone and quadriceps grafts survived greater simulated loading than hamstrings grafts, but smaller simulated loading than the native ACL. Median peak strain prior to failure was 20.3% (11.6, 24.5) for the native ACL and 17.4% (9.5, 23.3) across all graft types.

interpretationThe simulator was a viable construct for mechanical examination of ACLR grafts in rupture environments. Post-surgery, ACL reconstruction complexes are weaker than the native ACL when subjected to equivalent loading. Bone tendon bone grafts most closely resembled the native ligament and provided the most consistently relevant rupture results. This model advocated reconstruction graft capacity to sustain forces generated from immediate gait and weightbearing during rehabilitation from an ACL injury.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAnterior Cruciate LigamentBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverHumansKnee JointPilot ProjectsACLACL reconstructionKnee biomechanicsSimulated landingSports medicine

Identifiers

PMID34052693
PMCPMC8278414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.