Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34052505›Full record

SynthesisTransplantation and cellular therapy2021

Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelofibrosis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jan Philipp Bewersdorf, Amar H Sheth, Shaurey Vetsa, Alyssa Grimshaw, Smith Giri, Nikolai A Podoltsev, Lohith Gowda, Roni Tamari, Martin S Tallman, Raajit K Rampal and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. JAK Inhibitors for Myelofibrosis: Strengths and Limitations.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jan Philipp BewersdorfDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Amar H ShethYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Shaurey VetsaYale School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, New Haven, Connecticut.
Alyssa GrimshawHarvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Smith GiriDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama School of Medicine.
Nikolai A PodoltsevDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Lohith GowdaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Roni TamariBone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Martin S TallmanLeukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Raajit K RampalLeukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Amer M ZeidanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Maximilian StahlDepartment of Medical Oncology, Adult Leukemia Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: maximilian_stahl@dfci.harvard.edu.
Yale University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Alabama · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Pathology Tissue Services Shared ResourceP30CA016359 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MEGAN C KING · 1985 to 2026
$85.0M
CLINICAL SCHOLARS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009512 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Ping Chi · 1985 to 2026
$6.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016359NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) remains the only potentially curative therapeutic modality for patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis (MF). However, many patients are considered ineligible for allo-HCT, and transplant-related mortality can be substantial. Data on the efficacy and safety of allo-HCT are mixed and largely derived from retrospective studies. We aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the safety and efficacy of allo-HCT in MF and to identify patient, disease, and transplant characteristics with prognostic impact on outcomes of patients with MF undergoing allo-HCT. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to October 11, 2020, for studies on allo-HCT in MF. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates for the co-primary outcomes of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS). Rates of non-relapse mortality and acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) were studied as secondary endpoints. Subgroup analyses on the effect of conditioning regimen intensity, baseline dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) score, and patient age were performed. The study protocol has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020188706). Forty-three studies with 8739 patients were identified and included in this meta-analysis. Rates of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year OS were 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.5%-69.8%), 64.4% (95% CI, 57.6%-70.6%), and 55.0% (95% CI, 51.8%-58.3%), respectively. Rates of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year nonrelapse mortality were 25.9% (95% CI, 23.3%-28.7%), 29.7% (95% CI, 24.5%-35.4%), and 30.5% (95% CI, 25.9%-35.5%), respectively. The combined rate of graft failure was 10.6% (95% CI, 8.9%-12.5%) with primary and secondary graft failure occurring in 7.3% (95% CI, 5.7%-9.4%) and 5.9% (95% CI, 4.3%-8.0%) of patients, respectively. Rates of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were 44.0% (95% CI, 39.6%-48.4%; grade III/IV: 15.2%) and 46.5% (95% CI, 42.2%-50.8%; extensive or moderate/severe: 26.1%), respectively. Subgroup analyses did not show any significant difference between conditioning regimen intensity (myeloablative versus reduced-intensity), median patient age, and proportion of DIPSS-intermediate-2/high patients. The quality of the evidence is limited by the absence of randomized clinical trials in the field and the heterogeneity of patient and transplant characteristics across included studies. Given the poor prognosis of patients not receiving transplants and in the absence of curative nontransplantation therapies, our results support consideration of allo-HCT for eligible patients with MF.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPrimary MyelofibrosisHumansRetrospective StudiesTransplantation ConditioningAllogeneic Hematopoietic Cell TransplantGraft-versus-host diseaseMeta-analysisMyelofibrosisSurvival

Identifiers

PMID34052505
PMCPMC8478722
OpenAlexW3165712696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.