Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34051875›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2021

Therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cells on histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis in second-grade burn model.

Doaa Ramadan I Abdel-Gawad, Walaa A Moselhy, Rasha Rashad Ahmed, Hessah Mohammed Al-Muzafar, Kamal Adel Amin, Maha Mohamed Amin, El-Shaymaa El-Nahass, Khaled Abbas Helmy Abdou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Burn Wound Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Doaa Ramadan I Abdel-GawadToxicology and Forensic Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 62511, Egypt. doaaramadan1991@gmail.com.
Walaa A MoselhyToxicology and Forensic Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 62511, Egypt.
Rasha Rashad AhmedZoology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Hessah Mohammed Al-MuzafarDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Basic & Applied Scientific Research Center, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam City, 31441, Saudi Arabia.
Kamal Adel AminDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Basic & Applied Scientific Research Center, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam City, 31441, Saudi Arabia.
Maha Mohamed AminPathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
El-Shaymaa El-NahassVeterinary Pathology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Khaled Abbas Helmy AbdouToxicology and Forensic Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 62511, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimDeleterious cutaneous tissue damages could result from exposure to thermal trauma, which could be ameliorated structurally and functionally through therapy via the most multipotent progenitor bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs). This study aimed to induce burns and examine the effect of BM-MSCs during a short and long period of therapy. MATERIAL AND

methodsNinety albino rats were divided into three groups: group I (control); group II (burn model), the animals were exposed to the preheated aluminum bar at 100°C for 15 s; and group III (the burned animals subcutaneously injected with BM-MSCs (2×10

resultsSubcutaneous injection of BM-MSCs resulted in the decrease of the wound contraction rate; the wound having a pinpoint appearance and regular arrangement of the epidermal layer with thin stratum corneum; decrease in the area percentages of ADAMs10 expression; significant downregulation of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrotic factor-α (TNF-α), metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and microRNA-21; and marked upregulation of heat shock protein-90α (HSP-90α) especially in late stages.

conclusionBM-MSCs exhibited a powerful healing property through regulating the mediators of wound healing and restoring the normal skin structures, reducing the scar formation and the wound size.

Indexed as

BurnsMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMicroRNAsAnimalsCicatrixRatsWound HealingMicroRNAsmirn21 microRNA, ratBM-MSCsBurnHistopathologicalImmunohistochemicalqPCR

Identifiers

PMID34051875
PMCPMC8164255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.