ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2021
Evaluation of acidogenesis products' effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches.
Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of Up-Flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) and Characteristics of Its Microbial Community: A Review of Bibliometric Trend and Recent Findings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Can bio-HFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Steering the Chain-Elongating Microbiome to C8 or C6 Production with Ethanol and Lactate as Coelectron Donors.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Comparative genomic analysis and characterization of novel high-quality draft genomes from the coal metagenome.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Article
- Enhancement of Biodegradability of Chicken Manure via the Addition of Zeolite in a Two-Stage Dry Anaerobic Digestion Configuration.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A unified compendium of prokaryotic and viral genomes from over 300 anaerobic digestion microbiomes.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Inter-kingdom interactions and stability of methanogens revealed by machine-learning guided multi-omics analysis of industrial-scale biogas plants.The ISME journal · 2023Article
- Magnetite Nanoparticles and Carbon Nanotubes for Improving the Operation of Mesophilic Anaerobic Digesters.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Co-digestion approach for enhancement of biogas production by mixture of untreated napier grass and industrial hydrolyzed food waste.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure in the Presence of Magnetite, Granular Activated Carbon, and Biochar: Operation of Anaerobic Reactors and Microbial Community Structure.Microorganisms · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDuring the acetogenic step of anaerobic digestion, the products of acidogenesis are oxidized to substrates for methanogenesis: hydrogen, carbon dioxide and acetate. Acetogenesis and methanogenesis are highly interconnected processes due to the syntrophic associations between acetogenic bacteria and hydrogenotrophic methanogens, allowing the whole process to become thermodynamically favorable. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of the dominant acidic products on the metabolic pathways of methane formation and to find a core microbiome and substrate-specific species in a mixed biogas-producing system.
resultsFour methane-producing microbial communities were fed with artificial media having one dominant component, respectively, lactate, butyrate, propionate and acetate, for 896 days in 3.5-L Up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) bioreactors. All the microbial communities showed moderately different methane production and utilization of the substrates. Analyses of stable carbon isotope composition of the fermentation gas and the substrates showed differences in average values of δ
conclusionsIn this experimental system, the dominant fermentation products subjected to methanogenesis moderately modified the final effect of bioreactor performance. At the molecular level, a different contribution of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic pathways for methane production, a very high level of new species recovered, and a moderate variability in microbial composition depending on substrate availability were evidenced. Propionate was not a factor ceasing methane production. All these findings are relevant because lactate, acetate, propionate and butyrate are the universal products of acidogenesis, regardless of feedstock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.